From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-f173.google.com (mail-qk0-f173.google.com [209.85.220.173]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1B16B006E for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:06:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by qkbp125 with SMTP id p125so6055975qkb.2 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 08:06:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from resqmta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net. [2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:37]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 145si1171197qhb.22.2015.06.16.08.06.57 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Jun 2015 08:06:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 10:06:56 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] slub: initial bulk free implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20150615155053.18824.617.stgit@devil> <20150615155256.18824.42651.stgit@devil> <20150616072328.GB13125@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> <20150616112033.0b8bafb8@redhat.com> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Joonsoo Kim Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Joonsoo Kim , Linux Memory Management List , Andrew Morton , Linux-Netdev , Alexander Duyck On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > If adding these, then I would also need to add those on alloc path... > > Yes, please. Lets fall back to the generic implementation for any of these things. We need to focus on maximum performance in these functions. The more special cases we have to handle the more all of this gets compromised. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org