From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-f175.google.com (mail-ig0-f175.google.com [209.85.213.175]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230D66B0038 for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 14:27:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: by iggg4 with SMTP id g4so8406711igg.0 for ; Mon, 06 Apr 2015 11:27:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from resqmta-ch2-04v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-04v.sys.comcast.net. [2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:36]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 79si4314836iog.101.2015.04.06.11.27.09 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Apr 2015 11:27:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 13:27:07 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: Slab infrastructure for bulk object allocation and freeing V2 In-Reply-To: <20150402134239.8e8c538103640d697246ba6a@linux-foundation.org> Message-ID: References: <20150331142025.63249f2f0189aee231a6e0c8@linux-foundation.org> <20150402134239.8e8c538103640d697246ba6a@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linuxfoundation.org, Pekka Enberg , iamjoonsoo@lge.com On Thu, 2 Apr 2015, Andrew Morton wrote: > hm, OK. The per-allocator wrappers could be made static inline in .h > if that makes sense. The allocators will add code to the "per-allocator wrappers". Inlining that would be bad. Basicalkly the "wrapper" is the skeleon to which optimizations can be added while keeping the call to the generic implementaiton if the allocator has to punt for some reason. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org