From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
vdavydov@parallels.com, mgorman@suse.de, minchan@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: vmscan: fix the page state calculation in too_many_isolated
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:35:00 -0600 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1501261233550.16786@gentwo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150126174606.GD22681@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Please do not run the vmstat_updates concurrently. They update shared
> > cachelines and therefore can cause bouncing cachelines if run concurrently
> > on multiple cpus.
>
> Would you preffer to call smp_call_function_single on each CPU
> which needs an update? That would make vmstat_shepherd slower but that
> is not a big deal, is it?
Run it from the timer interrupt as usual from a work request? Those are
staggered.
> Anyway I am wondering whether the cache line bouncing between
> vmstat_update instances is a big deal in the real life. Updating shared
> counters whould bounce with many CPUs but this is an operation which is
> not done often. Also all the CPUs would have update the same counters
> all the time and I am not sure this happens that often. Do you have a
> load where this would be measurable?
Concurrent page faults update lots of counters concurrently. But will
those trigger the smp_call_function?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-26 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-14 11:36 Vinayak Menon
2015-01-14 16:50 ` Michal Hocko
2015-01-15 17:24 ` Vinayak Menon
2015-01-16 15:49 ` Michal Hocko
2015-01-16 17:57 ` Michal Hocko
2015-01-16 19:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-01-17 15:18 ` Vinayak Menon
2015-01-17 19:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-01-19 4:27 ` Vinayak Menon
2015-01-21 14:39 ` Michal Hocko
2015-01-22 15:16 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-01-22 16:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-01-26 17:46 ` Michal Hocko
2015-01-26 18:35 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2015-01-27 10:52 ` Michal Hocko
2015-01-27 16:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-01-30 15:28 ` Michal Hocko
2015-01-26 17:28 ` Michal Hocko
2015-01-26 18:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-01-26 22:11 ` Andrew Morton
2015-01-27 10:41 ` Michal Hocko
2015-01-27 10:33 ` Vinayak Menon
2015-01-27 10:45 ` Michal Hocko
2015-01-29 17:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-01-30 15:27 ` Michal Hocko
2015-01-16 1:17 ` Andrew Morton
2015-01-16 5:10 ` Vinayak Menon
2015-01-17 16:29 ` Vinayak Menon
2015-02-11 22:14 ` Andrew Morton
2015-02-12 16:19 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1501261233550.16786@gentwo.org \
--to=cl@linux.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
--cc=vinmenon@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox