linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 11/12] x86, mpx: cleanup unused bound tables
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 22:36:39 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1411112233180.3935@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54627512.7060806@intel.com>

On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 11/11/2014 10:27 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Nov 2014, Dave Hansen wrote:
> >> Instead of all of these games with dropping and reacquiring mmap_sem and
> >> adding other locks, or deferring the work, why don't we just do a
> >> get_user_pages()?  Something along the lines of:
> >>
> >> while (1) {
> >> 	ret = cmpxchg(addr)
> >> 	if (!ret)
> >> 		break;
> >> 	if (ret == -EFAULT)
> >> 		get_user_pages(addr);
> >> }
> >>
> >> Does anybody see a problem with that?
> > 
> > You want to do that under mmap_sem write held, right? Not a problem per
> > se, except that you block normal faults for a possibly long time when
> > the page(s) need to be swapped in.
> 
> Yeah, it might hold mmap_sem for write while doing this in the unmap
> path.  But, that's only if the bounds directory entry has been swapped
> out.  There's only 1 pointer of bounds directory entries there for every
> 1MB of data, so it _should_ be relatively rare.  It would mean that
> nobody's been accessing a 512MB swath of data controlled by the same
> page of the bounds directory.
> 
> If it gets to be an issue, we can always add some code to fault it in
> before mmap_sem is acquired.

I don't think it's a real issue.
 
> FWIW, I believe we have a fairly long road ahead of us to optimize MPX
> in practice.  I have a list of things I want to go investigate, but I
> have not looked in to it in detail at all.

:)
 
> > But yes, this might solve most of the issues at hand. Did not think
> > about GUP at all :(
> 
> Whew.  Fixing it was getting nasty and complicated. :)

Indeed. Though I think that distangling specific parts of MPX from
mmap_sem is still a worthwhile exercise. So not all of the complex
ideas we came up with during the discussion are lost in the pointless
complexity universe :)

Thanks,

	tglx

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-11 21:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-12  4:41 [PATCH v9 00/12] Intel MPX support Qiaowei Ren
2014-10-12  4:41 ` [PATCH v9 01/12] x86, mpx: introduce VM_MPX to indicate that a VMA is MPX specific Qiaowei Ren
2014-10-12  4:41 ` [PATCH v9 02/12] x86, mpx: rename cfg_reg_u and status_reg Qiaowei Ren
2014-10-12  4:41 ` [PATCH v9 03/12] x86, mpx: add MPX specific mmap interface Qiaowei Ren
2014-10-12  4:41 ` [PATCH v9 04/12] x86, mpx: add MPX to disaabled features Qiaowei Ren
2014-10-12  4:41 ` [PATCH v9 05/12] x86, mpx: on-demand kernel allocation of bounds tables Qiaowei Ren
2014-10-24 12:08   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-27  3:20     ` Ren Qiaowei
2014-10-28 17:43     ` Dave Hansen
2014-10-28 17:57       ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-12  4:41 ` [PATCH v9 06/12] mpx: extend siginfo structure to include bound violation information Qiaowei Ren
2014-10-12  4:41 ` [PATCH v9 07/12] mips: sync struct siginfo with general version Qiaowei Ren
2014-10-12  4:41 ` [PATCH v9 08/12] ia64: " Qiaowei Ren
2014-10-12  4:41 ` [PATCH v9 09/12] x86, mpx: decode MPX instruction to get bound violation information Qiaowei Ren
2014-10-24 12:36   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-27  1:43     ` Ren, Qiaowei
2014-10-27 20:36       ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-28  5:58         ` Ren Qiaowei
2014-10-31 20:16         ` Dave Hansen
2014-10-31 20:33           ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-30 22:38   ` Dave Hansen
2014-10-31  2:12     ` Ren Qiaowei
2014-10-31  9:09       ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-12  4:41 ` [PATCH v9 10/12] x86, mpx: add prctl commands PR_MPX_ENABLE_MANAGEMENT, PR_MPX_DISABLE_MANAGEMENT Qiaowei Ren
2014-10-24 12:49   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-24 15:10     ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-27  2:17     ` Ren, Qiaowei
2014-10-27 20:38       ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-28  5:57         ` Ren Qiaowei
2014-10-12  4:41 ` [PATCH v9 11/12] x86, mpx: cleanup unused bound tables Qiaowei Ren
2014-10-24 14:40   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-27  3:13     ` Ren Qiaowei
2014-10-27 20:49       ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-28  5:56         ` Ren Qiaowei
2014-10-28 10:42           ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-11-03 20:53         ` Dave Hansen
2014-11-03 21:29           ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-11-04 16:00             ` Dave Hansen
2014-11-04 17:02               ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-11-06 21:50     ` Dave Hansen
2014-11-11 18:27       ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-11-11 20:44         ` Dave Hansen
2014-11-11 21:36           ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2014-10-12  4:41 ` [PATCH v9 12/12] x86, mpx: add documentation on Intel MPX Qiaowei Ren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1411112233180.3935@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=qiaowei.ren@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox