From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qc0-f177.google.com (mail-qc0-f177.google.com [209.85.216.177]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD156B0031 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:49:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id r5so7075808qcx.22 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:49:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qmta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net. [2001:558:fe2d:43:76:96:30:64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m9si25554300qav.68.2014.06.30.08.49.06 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:49:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:49:03 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm v3 8/8] slab: do not keep free objects/slabs on dead memcg caches In-Reply-To: <20140627060534.GC9511@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> Message-ID: References: <20140624073840.GC4836@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> <20140625134545.GB22340@esperanza> <20140627060534.GC9511@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Joonsoo Kim Cc: Vladimir Davydov , akpm@linux-foundation.org, rientjes@google.com, penberg@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org On Fri, 27 Jun 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > Christoph, > Is it tolerable result for large scale system? Or do we need to find > another solution? The overhead is pretty intense but then this is a rare event I guess? It seems that it is much easier on the code and much faster to do the periodic reaping. Why not simply go with that? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org