From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qg0-f41.google.com (mail-qg0-f41.google.com [209.85.192.41]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0D86B0031 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:03:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id i50so2235028qgf.28 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 08:03:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net. [2001:558:fe2d:43:76:96:30:80]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n7si6852311qas.81.2014.06.19.08.03.07 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 08:03:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:03:04 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: slub/debugobjects: lockup when freeing memory In-Reply-To: <53A2F406.4010109@oracle.com> Message-ID: References: <53A2F406.4010109@oracle.com> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Sasha Levin Cc: Pekka Enberg , Thomas Gleixner , Matt Mackall , Andrew Morton , Dave Jones , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "Paul E. McKenney" Dave Jones , LKML On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Sasha Levin wrote: > [ 690.770137] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check (lib/smp_processor_id.c:63) > [ 690.770137] __slab_alloc (mm/slub.c:1732 mm/slub.c:2205 mm/slub.c:2369) > [ 690.770137] ? __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3189) > [ 690.770137] ? __debug_object_init (lib/debugobjects.c:100 lib/debugobjects.c:312) > [ 690.770137] kmem_cache_alloc (mm/slub.c:2442 mm/slub.c:2484 mm/slub.c:2489) > [ 690.770137] ? __debug_object_init (lib/debugobjects.c:100 lib/debugobjects.c:312) > [ 690.770137] ? debug_object_activate (lib/debugobjects.c:439) > [ 690.770137] __debug_object_init (lib/debugobjects.c:100 lib/debugobjects.c:312) > [ 690.770137] debug_object_init (lib/debugobjects.c:365) > [ 690.770137] rcuhead_fixup_activate (kernel/rcu/update.c:231) > [ 690.770137] debug_object_activate (lib/debugobjects.c:280 lib/debugobjects.c:439) > [ 690.770137] ? discard_slab (mm/slub.c:1486) > [ 690.770137] __call_rcu (kernel/rcu/rcu.h:76 (discriminator 2) kernel/rcu/tree.c:2585 (discriminator 2)) __call_rcu does a slab allocation? This means __call_rcu can no longer be used in slab allocators? What happened? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org