linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	kernel-team@fb.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v8 0/4] cgroup-aware OOM killer
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 13:46:08 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1709131340020.146292@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170913122914.5gdksbmkolum7ita@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Michal Hocko wrote:

> > > This patchset makes the OOM killer cgroup-aware.
> > > 
> > > v8:
> > >   - Do not kill tasks with OOM_SCORE_ADJ -1000
> > >   - Make the whole thing opt-in with cgroup mount option control
> > >   - Drop oom_priority for further discussions
> > 
> > Nack, we specifically require oom_priority for this to function correctly, 
> > otherwise we cannot prefer to kill from low priority leaf memcgs as 
> > required.
> 
> While I understand that your usecase might require priorities I do not
> think this part missing is a reason to nack the cgroup based selection
> and kill-all parts. This can be done on top. The only important part
> right now is the current selection semantic - only leaf memcgs vs. size
> of the hierarchy). I strongly believe that comparing only leaf memcgs
> is more straightforward and it doesn't lead to unexpected results as
> mentioned before (kill a small memcg which is a part of the larger
> sub-hierarchy).
> 

The problem is that we cannot enable the cgroup-aware oom killer and 
oom_group behavior because, without oom priorities, we have no ability to 
influence the cgroup that it chooses.  It is doing two things: providing 
more fairness amongst cgroups by selecting based on cumulative usage 
rather than single large process (good!), and effectively is removing all 
userspace control of oom selection (bad).  We want the former, but it 
needs to be coupled with support so that we can protect vital cgroups, 
regardless of their usage.

It is certainly possible to add oom priorities on top before it is merged, 
but I don't see why it isn't part of the patchset.  We need it before its 
merged to avoid users playing with /proc/pid/oom_score_adj to prevent any 
killing in the most preferable memcg when they could have simply changed 
the oom priority.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-13 20:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-11 13:17 Roman Gushchin
2017-09-11 13:17 ` [v8 1/4] mm, oom: refactor the oom_kill_process() function Roman Gushchin
2017-09-11 20:51   ` David Rientjes
2017-09-14 13:42   ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-11 13:17 ` [v8 2/4] mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer Roman Gushchin
2017-09-13 20:46   ` David Rientjes
2017-09-13 21:59     ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-11 13:17 ` [v8 3/4] mm, oom: add cgroup v2 mount option for " Roman Gushchin
2017-09-11 20:48   ` David Rientjes
2017-09-12 20:01     ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-12 20:23       ` David Rientjes
2017-09-13 12:23       ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-11 13:17 ` [v8 4/4] mm, oom, docs: describe the " Roman Gushchin
2017-09-11 20:44 ` [v8 0/4] " David Rientjes
2017-09-13 12:29   ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-13 20:46     ` David Rientjes [this message]
2017-09-14 13:34       ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-14 20:07         ` David Rientjes
2017-09-13 21:56     ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-14 13:40       ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-14 16:05         ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-15 10:58           ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-15 15:23             ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-15 19:55               ` David Rientjes
2017-09-15 21:08                 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-18  6:20                   ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-18 15:02                     ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-21  8:30                       ` David Rientjes
2017-09-19 20:54                   ` David Rientjes
2017-09-20 22:24                     ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-21  8:27                       ` David Rientjes
2017-09-18  6:16                 ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-19 20:51                   ` David Rientjes
2017-09-18  6:14               ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-20 21:53                 ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-25 12:24                   ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-25 17:00                     ` Johannes Weiner
2017-09-25 18:15                       ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-25 20:25                         ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-26 10:59                           ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-26 11:21                             ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-26 12:13                               ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-26 13:30                                 ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-26 17:26                                   ` Johannes Weiner
2017-09-27  3:37                                     ` Tim Hockin
2017-09-27  7:43                                       ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-27 10:19                                         ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-27 15:35                                         ` Tim Hockin
2017-09-27 16:23                                           ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-27 18:11                                             ` Tim Hockin
2017-10-01 23:29                                               ` Shakeel Butt
2017-10-02 11:56                                                 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-10-02 12:24                                                 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-02 12:47                                                   ` Roman Gushchin
2017-10-02 14:29                                                     ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-02 19:00                                                   ` Shakeel Butt
2017-10-02 19:28                                                     ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-02 19:45                                                       ` Shakeel Butt
2017-10-02 19:56                                                         ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-02 20:00                                                           ` Tim Hockin
2017-10-02 20:08                                                             ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-02 20:09                                                             ` Shakeel Butt
2017-10-02 20:20                                                             ` Shakeel Butt
2017-10-02 20:24                                                           ` Shakeel Butt
2017-10-02 20:34                                                             ` Johannes Weiner
2017-10-02 20:55                                                             ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-25 22:21                       ` David Rientjes
2017-09-26  8:46                         ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-26 21:04                           ` David Rientjes
2017-09-27  7:37                             ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-27  9:57                               ` Roman Gushchin
2017-09-21 14:21   ` Johannes Weiner
2017-09-21 21:17     ` David Rientjes
2017-09-21 21:51       ` Johannes Weiner
2017-09-22 20:53         ` David Rientjes
2017-09-22 15:44       ` Tejun Heo
2017-09-22 20:39         ` David Rientjes
2017-09-22 21:05           ` Tejun Heo
2017-09-23  8:16             ` David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.10.1709131340020.146292@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
    --to=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox