linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mm, oom: prevent additional oom kills before memory is freed
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 14:26:26 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1706151420300.95906@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170615103909.GG1486@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Michal Hocko wrote:

> > If mm->mm_users is not incremented because it is already zero by the oom
> > reaper, meaning the final refcount has been dropped, do not set
> > MMF_OOM_SKIP prematurely.
> > 
> > __mmput() may not have had a chance to do exit_mmap() yet, so memory from
> > a previous oom victim is still mapped.
> 
> true and do we have a _guarantee_ it will do it? E.g. can somebody block
> exit_aio from completing? Or can somebody hold mmap_sem and thus block
> ksm_exit resp. khugepaged_exit from completing? The reason why I was
> conservative and set such a mm as MMF_OOM_SKIP was because I couldn't
> give a definitive answer to those questions. And we really _want_ to
> have a guarantee of a forward progress here. Killing an additional
> proecess is a price to pay and if that doesn't trigger normall it sounds
> like a reasonable compromise to me.
> 

I have not seen any issues where __mmput() stalls and exit_mmap() fails to 
free its mapped memory once mm->mm_users has dropped to 0.

> > __mput() naturally requires no
> > references on mm->mm_users to do exit_mmap().
> > 
> > Without this, several processes can be oom killed unnecessarily and the
> > oom log can show an abundance of memory available if exit_mmap() is in
> > progress at the time the process is skipped.
> 
> Have you seen this happening in the real life?
> 

Yes, quite a bit in testing.

One oom kill shows the system to be oom:

[22999.488705] Node 0 Normal free:90484kB min:90500kB ...
[22999.488711] Node 1 Normal free:91536kB min:91948kB ...

followed up by one or more unnecessary oom kills showing the oom killer 
racing with memory freeing of the victim:

[22999.510329] Node 0 Normal free:229588kB min:90500kB ...
[22999.510334] Node 1 Normal free:600036kB min:91948kB ...

The patch is absolutely required for us to prevent continuous oom killing 
of processes after a single process has been oom killed and its memory is 
in the process of being freed.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-06-15 21:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-14 23:43 David Rientjes
2017-06-15 10:39 ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-15 10:53   ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-06-15 11:01     ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-15 11:32       ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-06-15 12:03         ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-15 12:13           ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-15 13:01             ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-06-15 13:22               ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-15 21:43                 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-06-15 21:37               ` David Rientjes
2017-06-15 12:20       ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-15 21:26   ` David Rientjes [this message]
2017-06-15 21:41     ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-15 22:03       ` David Rientjes
2017-06-15 22:12         ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-15 22:42           ` David Rientjes
2017-06-16  8:06             ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-16  0:54           ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-06-16  4:00             ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-06-16  8:39             ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-16 10:27               ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-06-16 11:02                 ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-16 14:26                   ` Re: [patch] mm, oom: prevent additional oom kills before memoryis freed Tetsuo Handa
2017-06-16 14:42                     ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-17 13:30                       ` Re: [patch] mm, oom: prevent additional oom kills before memory is freed Tetsuo Handa
2017-06-23 12:38                         ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-16 12:22       ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-06-16 14:12         ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-17  5:17           ` [PATCH] mm,oom_kill: Close race window of needlessly selecting new victims Tetsuo Handa
2017-06-20 22:12             ` David Rientjes
2017-06-21  2:17               ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-06-21 20:31                 ` David Rientjes
2017-06-22  0:53                   ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-06-23 12:45                     ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-21 13:18               ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.10.1706151420300.95906@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
    --to=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox