From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/19] tree wide: get rid of __GFP_REPEAT for order-0 allocations part I
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:56:28 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1604141255020.6593@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460372892-8157-2-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org>
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>
> __GFP_REPEAT has a rather weak semantic but since it has been introduced
> around 2.6.12 it has been ignored for low order allocations. Yet we have
> the full kernel tree with its usage for apparently order-0 allocations.
> This is really confusing because __GFP_REPEAT is explicitly documented
> to allow allocation failures which is a weaker semantic than the current
> order-0 has (basically nofail).
>
> Let's simply drop __GFP_REPEAT from those places. This would allow
> to identify place which really need allocator to retry harder and
> formulate a more specific semantic for what the flag is supposed to do
> actually.
>
> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
I did exactly this before, and Andrew objected saying that __GFP_REPEAT
may not be needed for the current page allocator's implementation but
could with others and that setting __GFP_REPEAT for an allocation
provided useful information with regards to intent. At the time, I
attempted to eliminate __GFP_REPEAT entirely.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-14 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-11 11:07 [PATCH 0/19] get rid of superfluous __GFP_REPORT Michal Hocko
2016-04-11 11:07 ` [PATCH 01/19] tree wide: get rid of __GFP_REPEAT for order-0 allocations part I Michal Hocko
2016-04-14 19:56 ` David Rientjes [this message]
2016-04-15 7:44 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-11 11:07 ` [PATCH 02/19] x86: get rid of superfluous __GFP_REPEAT Michal Hocko
2016-04-11 11:07 ` [PATCH 03/19] x86/efi: " Michal Hocko
2016-04-12 15:53 ` Matt Fleming
2016-04-11 11:07 ` [PATCH 04/19] arm: " Michal Hocko
2016-04-11 11:07 ` [PATCH 05/19] arm64: " Michal Hocko
2016-04-11 15:49 ` Will Deacon
2016-04-11 11:07 ` [PATCH 06/19] arc: " Michal Hocko
2016-04-11 14:23 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-04-11 11:08 ` [PATCH 07/19] mips: " Michal Hocko
2016-04-11 11:08 ` [PATCH 08/19] nios2: " Michal Hocko
2016-04-11 11:08 ` [PATCH 09/19] parisc: " Michal Hocko
2016-04-11 11:08 ` [PATCH 10/19] score: " Michal Hocko
2016-04-11 11:08 ` [PATCH 11/19] powerpc: " Michal Hocko
2016-04-11 11:08 ` [PATCH 12/19] sparc: " Michal Hocko
2016-04-11 11:08 ` [PATCH 13/19] s390: " Michal Hocko
2016-04-11 11:28 ` Cornelia Huck
2016-04-11 12:47 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-04-11 11:08 ` [PATCH 14/19] sh: " Michal Hocko
2016-04-11 11:08 ` [PATCH 15/19] tile: " Michal Hocko
2016-04-11 11:08 ` [PATCH 16/19] unicore32: " Michal Hocko
2016-04-11 11:08 ` [PATCH 17/19] dm: get rid of superfluous gfp flags Michal Hocko
2016-04-15 12:29 ` Mikulas Patocka
2016-04-15 13:08 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-15 18:41 ` Mikulas Patocka
2016-04-16 20:31 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-22 12:47 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-26 17:20 ` Mikulas Patocka
2016-04-27 8:35 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-11 11:08 ` [PATCH 18/19] crypto: get rid of superfluous __GFP_REPEAT Michal Hocko
2016-04-14 6:27 ` Herbert Xu
2016-04-14 7:02 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-14 8:16 ` Herbert Xu
2016-04-14 8:51 ` [PATCH resend] " Michal Hocko
2016-04-15 14:37 ` Herbert Xu
2016-04-11 11:08 ` [PATCH 19/19] jbd2: " Michal Hocko
2016-04-13 11:21 ` CC in git cover letter vs patches (was Re: [PATCH 0/19] get rid of superfluous __GFP_REPORT) Vineet Gupta
2016-04-13 13:33 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.10.1604141255020.6593@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
--to=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox