From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f182.google.com (mail-pf0-f182.google.com [209.85.192.182]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B84682963 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 17:58:09 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pf0-f182.google.com with SMTP id n128so21487086pfn.3 for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 14:58:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pf0-x231.google.com (mail-pf0-x231.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400e:c00::231]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l84si11982788pfb.158.2016.02.03.14.58.08 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Feb 2016 14:58:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id w123so21770816pfb.0 for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 14:58:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 14:58:06 -0800 (PST) From: David Rientjes Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4 In-Reply-To: <20160203132718.GI6757@dhcp22.suse.cz> Message-ID: References: <1450203586-10959-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org> <20160203132718.GI6757@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Michal Hocko Cc: Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Johannes Weiner , Mel Gorman , Tetsuo Handa , Hillf Danton , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML On Wed, 3 Feb 2016, Michal Hocko wrote: > Hi, > this thread went mostly quite. Are all the main concerns clarified? > Are there any new concerns? Are there any objections to targeting > this for the next merge window? Did we ever figure out what was causing the oom killer to be called much earlier in Tetsuo's http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=145096089726481 and http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=145130454913757 ? I'd like to take a look at the patch(es) that fixed it. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org