linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: mhocko@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@suse.de,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, oleg@redhat.com, hughd@google.com,
	andrea@kernel.org, riel@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm, oom: introduce oom reaper
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 14:55:49 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1602021452400.9118@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201602022048.GCJ04176.tOFFSVFHLMJOQO@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>

On Tue, 2 Feb 2016, Tetsuo Handa wrote:

> Maybe we all agree with introducing OOM reaper without queuing, but I do
> want to see a guarantee for scheduling for next OOM-kill operation before
> trying to build a reliable queuing chain.
> 

The race can be fixed in two ways which I've already enumerated, but the 
scheduling issue is tangential: the oom_reaper kthread is going to run; 
increasing it's priority will only interfere with other innocent processes 
that are not attached to the oom memcg hierarchy, have disjoint cpuset 
mems, or are happily allocating from mempolicy nodes with free memory.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-02 22:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-06 15:42 [PATCH 0/2 -mm] oom reaper v4 Michal Hocko
2016-01-06 15:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm, oom: introduce oom reaper Michal Hocko
2016-01-07 11:23   ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-07 12:30     ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-11 22:54   ` Andrew Morton
2016-01-12  8:16     ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-28  1:28   ` David Rientjes
2016-01-28 21:42     ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-02  3:02       ` David Rientjes
2016-02-02  8:57         ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-02 11:48           ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-02-02 22:55             ` David Rientjes [this message]
2016-02-02 22:51           ` David Rientjes
2016-02-03 10:31             ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-06 15:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] oom reaper: handle anonymous mlocked pages Michal Hocko
2016-01-07  8:14   ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-11 12:42 ` [PATCH 3/2] oom: clear TIF_MEMDIE after oom_reaper managed to unmap the address space Michal Hocko
2016-01-11 16:52   ` Johannes Weiner
2016-01-11 17:46     ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-15 10:58     ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-18  4:35   ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-18 10:22     ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-26 16:38     ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-28 11:24       ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-28 21:51         ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-28 22:26           ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-28 22:36             ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-28 22:33   ` Michal Hocko
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-12-15 18:36 [PATCH 1/2] mm, oom: introduce oom reaper Michal Hocko
2015-12-17  0:50 ` Andrew Morton
2015-12-17 13:02   ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-17 19:55     ` Linus Torvalds
2015-12-17 20:00       ` Andrew Morton
2015-12-18 11:54         ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-18 21:14           ` Andrew Morton
2015-12-21  8:38             ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-17 21:13     ` Andrew Morton
2015-12-18 12:11       ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-18 12:10     ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-12-20  7:14       ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-12-18  0:15 ` Andrew Morton
2015-12-18 11:48   ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-21 20:38 ` Paul Gortmaker
2016-01-06  9:10   ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-06 14:26     ` Paul Gortmaker
2016-01-06 15:00       ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-23 23:00 ` Ross Zwisler
2015-12-24  9:47   ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-24 11:06     ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-12-24 20:39       ` Ross Zwisler
2015-12-25 11:41       ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-24 20:44     ` Ross Zwisler
2015-12-25 11:35       ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-25 11:44         ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.10.1602021452400.9118@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
    --to=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrea@kernel.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox