From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f50.google.com (mail-pa0-f50.google.com [209.85.220.50]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE3D6B0278 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 18:22:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: by padhy16 with SMTP id hy16so52769892pad.1 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:22:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pa0-x22b.google.com (mail-pa0-x22b.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22b]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fe1si3820463pab.169.2015.09.30.15.22.54 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:22:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pacex6 with SMTP id ex6so52867804pac.0 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:22:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:22:52 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] mm, page_alloc: Remove unnecessary taking of a seqlock when cpusets are disabled In-Reply-To: <1442832762-7247-4-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net> Message-ID: References: <1442832762-7247-1-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net> <1442832762-7247-4-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Mel Gorman Cc: Andrew Morton , Johannes Weiner , Rik van Riel , Vlastimil Babka , Joonsoo Kim , Michal Hocko , Linux-MM , LKML On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Mel Gorman wrote: > There is a seqcounter that protects against spurious allocation failures > when a task is changing the allowed nodes in a cpuset. There is no need > to check the seqcounter until a cpuset exists. > > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman > Acked-by: Christoph Lameter > Acked-by: David Rientjes > Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka > Acked-by: Michal Hocko > --- > include/linux/cpuset.h | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/cpuset.h b/include/linux/cpuset.h > index 1b357997cac5..6eb27cb480b7 100644 > --- a/include/linux/cpuset.h > +++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h > @@ -104,6 +104,9 @@ extern void cpuset_print_task_mems_allowed(struct task_struct *p); > */ > static inline unsigned int read_mems_allowed_begin(void) > { > + if (!cpusets_enabled()) > + return 0; > + > return read_seqcount_begin(¤t->mems_allowed_seq); > } > > @@ -115,6 +118,9 @@ static inline unsigned int read_mems_allowed_begin(void) > */ > static inline bool read_mems_allowed_retry(unsigned int seq) > { > + if (!cpusets_enabled()) > + return false; > + > return read_seqcount_retry(¤t->mems_allowed_seq, seq); > } > I thought this was going to test nr_cpusets() <= 1? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org