linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jakob Unterwurzacher <jakobunt@gmail.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] oom: Do not panic when OOM killer is sysrq triggered
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 16:36:14 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1507081635030.16585@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436360661-31928-2-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.com>

On Wed, 8 Jul 2015, Michal Hocko wrote:

> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> 
> OOM killer might be triggered explicitly via sysrq+f. This is supposed
> to kill a task no matter what e.g. a task is selected even though there
> is an OOM victim on the way to exit. This is a big hammer for an admin
> to help to resolve a memory short condition when the system is not able
> to cope with it on its own in a reasonable time frame (e.g. when the
> system is trashing or the OOM killer cannot make sufficient progress)
> 
> E.g. it doesn't make any sense to obey panic_on_oom setting because
> a) administrator could have used other sysrqs to achieve the
> panic/reboot and b) the policy would break an existing usecase to
> kill a memory hog which would be recoverable unlike the panic which
> might be configured for the real OOM condition.
> 
> It also doesn't make much sense to panic the system when there is no
> OOM killable task because administrator might choose to do additional
> steps before rebooting/panicking the system.
> 
> While we are there also add a comment explaining why
> sysctl_oom_kill_allocating_task doesn't apply to sysrq triggered OOM
> killer even though there is no explicit check and we subtly rely
> on current->mm being NULL for the context from which it is triggered.
> 
> Also be more explicit about sysrq+f behavior in the documentation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>

Nack, this is already handled by patch 2 in my series.  I understand that 
the titles were wrong for patches 2 and 3, but it doesn't mean we need to 
add hacks around the code before organizing this into struct oom_control 
or completely pointless comments and printks that will fill the kernel 
log.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-08 23:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-08 13:04 [PATCH 0/4] oom: sysrq+f fixes + cleanups Michal Hocko
2015-07-08 13:04 ` [PATCH 1/4] oom: Do not panic when OOM killer is sysrq triggered Michal Hocko
2015-07-08 23:36   ` David Rientjes [this message]
2015-07-09  8:23     ` Michal Hocko
2015-07-09 21:03       ` David Rientjes
2015-07-10  7:41         ` Michal Hocko
2015-07-08 13:04 ` [PATCH 2/4] oom: Do not invoke oom notifiers on sysrq+f Michal Hocko
2015-07-08 23:37   ` David Rientjes
2015-07-09  8:55     ` Michal Hocko
2015-07-09 21:07       ` David Rientjes
2015-07-10  7:40         ` Michal Hocko
2015-07-14 21:58           ` David Rientjes
2015-07-15  9:42             ` Michal Hocko
2015-07-15 22:21               ` David Rientjes
2015-07-15 22:44               ` [patch -mm] mm, oom: move oom notifiers to page allocator David Rientjes
2015-07-16  7:12                 ` Michal Hocko
2015-07-08 13:04 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm, oom: organize oom context into struct Michal Hocko
2015-07-08 23:38   ` David Rientjes
2015-07-09  8:56     ` Michal Hocko
2015-07-09 21:09       ` David Rientjes
2015-07-08 13:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] oom: split out forced OOM killer Michal Hocko
2015-07-08 23:41   ` David Rientjes
2015-07-09 10:05     ` Michal Hocko
2015-07-09 21:27       ` David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.10.1507081635030.16585@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
    --to=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jakobunt@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox