From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f171.google.com (mail-ie0-f171.google.com [209.85.223.171]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BBE6B006C for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 16:07:56 -0500 (EST) Received: by iecrl12 with SMTP id rl12so70683270iec.2 for ; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 13:07:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ig0-x22b.google.com (mail-ig0-x22b.google.com. [2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22b]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id sd3si6672831igb.32.2015.03.04.13.07.56 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Mar 2015 13:07:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by igjz20 with SMTP id z20so40208637igj.4 for ; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 13:07:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 13:07:54 -0800 (PST) From: David Rientjes Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: make CONFIG_MEMCG depend on CONFIG_MMU In-Reply-To: <20150304192836.GA952@dhcp22.suse.cz> Message-ID: References: <1425492428-27562-1-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz> <20150304190635.GC21350@phnom.home.cmpxchg.org> <20150304192836.GA952@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Michal Hocko Cc: Johannes Weiner , Andrew Morton , Chen Gang <762976180@qq.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML , Balbir Singh On Wed, 4 Mar 2015, Michal Hocko wrote: > Does it really make sense to do this minor tweaks when the configuration > is barely usable and we are not aware of anybody actually using it in > the real life? > If the memcg kmem extension continues to be improved, I'm wondering if anybody would want to use memcg only for kmem limiting. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org