From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qa0-f50.google.com (mail-qa0-f50.google.com [209.85.216.50]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C956B0031 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 10:47:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id j15so5001888qaq.37 for ; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 07:47:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net. [2001:558:fe2d:43:76:96:30:32]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1si14146142qap.29.2014.06.03.07.47.51 for ; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 07:47:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 09:47:49 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] slub: Use new node functions In-Reply-To: <20140603065756.GA31135@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> Message-ID: References: <20140530182753.191965442@linux.com> <20140530182801.436674724@linux.com> <20140602045933.GC17964@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> <20140603065756.GA31135@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Joonsoo Kim Cc: Pekka Enberg , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Andrew Morton , David Rientjes On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > I think that We can also replace for_each_node_state() in > free_kmem_cache_nodes(). What prevent it from being replaced? There is the problem that we are assigning NULL to s->node[node] which would not be covered so I thought I defer that for later when we deal with corner cases. > > > > Here is a patch doing the additional modifications: > > > > Seems good to me. Ok, who is queuing the patches? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org