From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qg0-f52.google.com (mail-qg0-f52.google.com [209.85.192.52]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D94316B003B for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 12:56:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id a108so14239419qge.39 for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 09:56:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net. [2001:558:fe2d:43:76:96:30:16]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f6si18225348qag.75.2014.05.27.09.56.47 for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 09:56:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 11:56:44 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] VM_PINNED In-Reply-To: <20140527164341.GD11074@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> Message-ID: References: <20140526145605.016140154@infradead.org> <20140526203232.GC5444@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20140527102909.GO30445@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20140527144655.GC19143@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20140527153143.GD19143@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20140527164341.GD11074@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins , Mel Gorman , Roland Dreier , Sean Hefty , Hal Rosenstock , Mike Marciniszyn On Tue, 27 May 2014, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Code could be easily added to alloc_pages_vma() to consider the pinned > > status on allocation. Remove GFP_MOVABLE if the vma is pinned. > > Yes, but alloc_pages_vma() isn't used for shared pages (with exception > of shmem and hugetlbfs). alloc_pages_vma() is used for all paths where we populate address ranges with pages. This is what we are doing when pinning. Pages are not allocated outside of a vma context. What do you mean by shared pages that are not shmem pages? AnonPages that are referenced from multiple processes? > So whichever way around we have to do the mm_populate() + eviction hook > + migration code, and since that equally covers the anon case, why > bother? Migration is expensive and the memory registration overhead already causes lots of complaints. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org