From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qc0-f177.google.com (mail-qc0-f177.google.com [209.85.216.177]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163836B0031 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:11:38 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id i8so817271qcq.36 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 08:11:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from qmta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net. [2001:558:fe2d:43:76:96:30:40]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r62si1285871yhc.123.2014.02.19.08.11.36 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 08:11:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:11:33 -0600 (CST) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node In-Reply-To: <20140218222242.GA10844@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <20140210191321.GD1558@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140211074159.GB27870@lge.com> <20140213065137.GA10860@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140217070051.GE3468@lge.com> <20140218172832.GD31998@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140218210923.GA28170@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140218222242.GA10844@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Nishanth Aravamudan Cc: Joonsoo Kim , David Rientjes , Han Pingtian , Pekka Enberg , Linux Memory Management List , Paul Mackerras , Anton Blanchard , Matt Mackall , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Wanpeng Li On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > the performance impact of the underlying NUMA configuration. I guess we > could special-case memoryless/cpuless configurations somewhat, but I > don't think there's any reason to do that if we can make memoryless-node > support work in-kernel? Well we can make it work in-kernel but it always has been a bit wacky (as is the idea of numa "memory" nodes without memory). -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org