From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qa0-f42.google.com (mail-qa0-f42.google.com [209.85.216.42]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5312F6B0031 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:48:31 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id k4so18902543qaq.15 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:48:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from qmta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net. [2001:558:fe2d:43:76:96:30:17]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e60si4460853qgf.182.2014.02.14.10.48.30 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:48:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 12:48:28 -0600 (CST) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] slab: destroy a slab without holding any alien cache lock In-Reply-To: <1392361043-22420-9-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Message-ID: References: <1392361043-22420-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> <1392361043-22420-9-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Joonsoo Kim Cc: Pekka Enberg , Andrew Morton , David Rientjes , Wanpeng Li , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joonsoo Kim On Fri, 14 Feb 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > I haven't heard that this alien cache lock is contended, but to reduce > chance of contention would be better generally. And with this change, > we can simplify complex lockdep annotation in slab code. > In the following patch, it will be implemented. Ok. Same move as before with the regular freeing. Acked-by: Christoph Lameter -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org