From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28FD96B0037 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 18:06:40 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id c9so4539805qcz.13 for ; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 15:06:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net. [2001:558:fe2d:43:76:96:30:80]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t101si1071319qge.101.2014.02.06.09.25.32 for ; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 09:26:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 11:25:29 -0600 (CST) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory In-Reply-To: <20140206020833.GD5433@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <20140125011041.GB25344@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140127055805.GA2471@lge.com> <20140128182947.GA1591@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140203230026.GA15383@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140204072630.GB10101@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140205001352.GC10101@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140206020833.GD5433@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Nishanth Aravamudan Cc: Han Pingtian , mpm@selenic.com, penberg@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, paulus@samba.org, Anton Blanchard , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Wanpeng Li On Wed, 5 Feb 2014, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > Right so if we are ignoring the node then the simplest thing to do is to > > not deactivate the current cpu slab but to take an object from it. > > Ok, that's what Anton's patch does, I believe. Are you ok with that > patch as it is? No. Again his patch only works if the node is memoryless not if there are other issues that prevent allocation from that node. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org