From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] mm, compaction: report compaction as contended only due to lock contention
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 16:50:18 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1406091647140.17705@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402305982-6928-2-git-send-email-vbabka@suse.cz>
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Async compaction aborts when it detects zone lock contention or need_resched()
> is true. David Rientjes has reported that in practice, most direct async
> compactions for THP allocation abort due to need_resched(). This means that a
> second direct compaction is never attempted, which might be OK for a page
> fault, but hugepaged is intended to attempt a sync compaction in such case and
> in these cases it won't.
>
> This patch replaces "bool contended" in compact_control with an enum that
> distinguieshes between aborting due to need_resched() and aborting due to lock
> contention. This allows propagating the abort through all compaction functions
> as before, but declaring the direct compaction as contended only when lock
> contantion has been detected.
>
> As a result, hugepaged will proceed with second sync compaction as intended,
> when the preceding async compaction aborted due to need_resched().
>
s/hugepaged/khugepaged/ on the changelog.
> Reported-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> ---
> mm/compaction.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
> mm/internal.h | 15 +++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index b73b182..d37f4a8 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -185,9 +185,14 @@ static void update_pageblock_skip(struct compact_control *cc,
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_COMPACTION */
>
> -static inline bool should_release_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
> +enum compact_contended should_release_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
> {
> - return need_resched() || spin_is_contended(lock);
> + if (need_resched())
> + return COMPACT_CONTENDED_SCHED;
> + else if (spin_is_contended(lock))
> + return COMPACT_CONTENDED_LOCK;
> + else
> + return COMPACT_CONTENDED_NONE;
> }
>
> /*
I think eventually we're going to remove the need_resched() heuristic
entirely and so enum compact_contended might be overkill, but do we need
to worry about spin_is_contended(lock) && need_resched() reporting
COMPACT_CONTENDED_SCHED here instead of COMPACT_CONTENDED_LOCK?
> @@ -202,7 +207,9 @@ static inline bool should_release_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
> static bool compact_checklock_irqsave(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long *flags,
> bool locked, struct compact_control *cc)
> {
> - if (should_release_lock(lock)) {
> + enum compact_contended contended = should_release_lock(lock);
> +
> + if (contended) {
> if (locked) {
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, *flags);
> locked = false;
> @@ -210,7 +217,7 @@ static bool compact_checklock_irqsave(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long *flags,
>
> /* async aborts if taking too long or contended */
> if (cc->mode == MIGRATE_ASYNC) {
> - cc->contended = true;
> + cc->contended = contended;
> return false;
> }
>
> @@ -236,7 +243,7 @@ static inline bool compact_should_abort(struct compact_control *cc)
> /* async compaction aborts if contended */
> if (need_resched()) {
> if (cc->mode == MIGRATE_ASYNC) {
> - cc->contended = true;
> + cc->contended = COMPACT_CONTENDED_SCHED;
> return true;
> }
>
> @@ -1095,7 +1102,8 @@ static unsigned long compact_zone_order(struct zone *zone, int order,
> VM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&cc.freepages));
> VM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&cc.migratepages));
>
> - *contended = cc.contended;
> + /* We only signal lock contention back to the allocator */
> + *contended = cc.contended == COMPACT_CONTENDED_LOCK;
> return ret;
> }
>
Hmm, since the only thing that matters for cc->contended is
COMPACT_CONTENDED_LOCK, it may make sense to just leave this as a bool
within struct compact_control instead of passing the actual reason around
when it doesn't matter.
> diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
> index 7f22a11f..4659e8e 100644
> --- a/mm/internal.h
> +++ b/mm/internal.h
> @@ -117,6 +117,13 @@ extern int user_min_free_kbytes;
>
> #if defined CONFIG_COMPACTION || defined CONFIG_CMA
>
> +/* Used to signal whether compaction detected need_sched() or lock contention */
> +enum compact_contended {
> + COMPACT_CONTENDED_NONE = 0, /* no contention detected */
> + COMPACT_CONTENDED_SCHED, /* need_sched() was true */
> + COMPACT_CONTENDED_LOCK, /* zone lock or lru_lock was contended */
> +};
> +
> /*
> * in mm/compaction.c
> */
> @@ -144,10 +151,10 @@ struct compact_control {
> int order; /* order a direct compactor needs */
> int migratetype; /* MOVABLE, RECLAIMABLE etc */
> struct zone *zone;
> - bool contended; /* True if a lock was contended, or
> - * need_resched() true during async
> - * compaction
> - */
> + enum compact_contended contended; /* Signal need_sched() or lock
> + * contention detected during
> + * compaction
> + */
> };
>
> unsigned long
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-09 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-09 9:26 [PATCH 01/10] mm, compaction: do not recheck suitable_migration_target under lock Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-09 9:26 ` [PATCH 02/10] mm, compaction: report compaction as contended only due to lock contention Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-09 23:50 ` David Rientjes [this message]
2014-06-10 7:11 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-10 23:40 ` David Rientjes
2014-06-11 1:10 ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-11 12:22 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-11 23:49 ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-12 14:02 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-13 2:40 ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-20 11:47 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-09 9:26 ` [PATCH 03/10] mm, compaction: periodically drop lock and restore IRQs in scanners Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-09 23:58 ` David Rientjes
2014-06-10 7:15 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-10 23:41 ` David Rientjes
2014-06-11 1:32 ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-11 11:24 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-09 9:26 ` [PATCH 04/10] mm, compaction: skip rechecks when lock was already held Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-10 0:00 ` David Rientjes
2014-06-11 1:50 ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-09 9:26 ` [PATCH 05/10] mm, compaction: remember position within pageblock in free pages scanner Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-10 0:07 ` David Rientjes
2014-06-11 2:12 ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-11 8:16 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-06-11 11:41 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-11 11:33 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-11 3:29 ` Zhang Yanfei
2014-06-09 9:26 ` [PATCH 06/10] mm, compaction: skip buddy pages by their order in the migrate scanner Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-10 0:08 ` David Rientjes
2014-06-09 9:26 ` [PATCH 07/10] mm: rename allocflags_to_migratetype for clarity Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-11 2:41 ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-11 3:38 ` Zhang Yanfei
2014-06-09 9:26 ` [PATCH 08/10] mm, compaction: pass gfp mask to compact_control Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-11 2:48 ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-11 11:46 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-12 0:24 ` David Rientjes
2014-06-09 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] mm, compaction: try to capture the just-created high-order freepage Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-11 14:56 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-12 2:20 ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-12 8:21 ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-09 9:26 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] mm, compaction: do not migrate pages when that cannot satisfy page fault allocation Vlastimil Babka
2014-06-09 23:41 ` [PATCH 01/10] mm, compaction: do not recheck suitable_migration_target under lock David Rientjes
2014-06-11 0:33 ` Minchan Kim
2014-06-11 2:45 ` Zhang Yanfei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1406091647140.17705@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
--to=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mina86@mina86.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox