From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@huawei.com>,
Tim Hockin <thockin@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 05/11] res_counter: remove interface for locked charging and uncharging
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 19:59:22 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1403041955250.8067@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1403041952170.8067@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
The res_counter_{charge,uncharge}_locked() variants are not used in the
kernel outside of the resource counter code itself, so remove the
interface.
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
---
Documentation/cgroups/resource_counter.txt | 12 ++----------
include/linux/res_counter.h | 6 +-----
kernel/res_counter.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/cgroups/resource_counter.txt b/Documentation/cgroups/resource_counter.txt
--- a/Documentation/cgroups/resource_counter.txt
+++ b/Documentation/cgroups/resource_counter.txt
@@ -76,15 +76,7 @@ to work with it.
limit_fail_at parameter is set to the particular res_counter element
where the charging failed.
- d. int res_counter_charge_locked
- (struct res_counter *rc, unsigned long val, bool force)
-
- The same as res_counter_charge(), but it must not acquire/release the
- res_counter->lock internally (it must be called with res_counter->lock
- held). The force parameter indicates whether we can bypass the limit.
-
- e. u64 res_counter_uncharge[_locked]
- (struct res_counter *rc, unsigned long val)
+ d. u64 res_counter_uncharge(struct res_counter *rc, unsigned long val)
When a resource is released (freed) it should be de-accounted
from the resource counter it was accounted to. This is called
@@ -93,7 +85,7 @@ to work with it.
The _locked routines imply that the res_counter->lock is taken.
- f. u64 res_counter_uncharge_until
+ e. u64 res_counter_uncharge_until
(struct res_counter *rc, struct res_counter *top,
unsigned long val)
diff --git a/include/linux/res_counter.h b/include/linux/res_counter.h
--- a/include/linux/res_counter.h
+++ b/include/linux/res_counter.h
@@ -104,15 +104,13 @@ void res_counter_init(struct res_counter *counter, struct res_counter *parent);
* units, e.g. numbers, bytes, Kbytes, etc
*
* returns 0 on success and <0 if the counter->usage will exceed the
- * counter->limit _locked call expects the counter->lock to be taken
+ * counter->limit
*
* charge_nofail works the same, except that it charges the resource
* counter unconditionally, and returns < 0 if the after the current
* charge we are over limit.
*/
-int __must_check res_counter_charge_locked(struct res_counter *counter,
- unsigned long val, bool force);
int __must_check res_counter_charge(struct res_counter *counter,
unsigned long val, struct res_counter **limit_fail_at);
int res_counter_charge_nofail(struct res_counter *counter,
@@ -125,12 +123,10 @@ int res_counter_charge_nofail(struct res_counter *counter,
* @val: the amount of the resource
*
* these calls check for usage underflow and show a warning on the console
- * _locked call expects the counter->lock to be taken
*
* returns the total charges still present in @counter.
*/
-u64 res_counter_uncharge_locked(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val);
u64 res_counter_uncharge(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val);
u64 res_counter_uncharge_until(struct res_counter *counter,
diff --git a/kernel/res_counter.c b/kernel/res_counter.c
--- a/kernel/res_counter.c
+++ b/kernel/res_counter.c
@@ -22,8 +22,18 @@ void res_counter_init(struct res_counter *counter, struct res_counter *parent)
counter->parent = parent;
}
-int res_counter_charge_locked(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val,
- bool force)
+static u64 res_counter_uncharge_locked(struct res_counter *counter,
+ unsigned long val)
+{
+ if (WARN_ON(counter->usage < val))
+ val = counter->usage;
+
+ counter->usage -= val;
+ return counter->usage;
+}
+
+static int res_counter_charge_locked(struct res_counter *counter,
+ unsigned long val, bool force)
{
int ret = 0;
@@ -86,15 +96,6 @@ int res_counter_charge_nofail(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val,
return __res_counter_charge(counter, val, limit_fail_at, true);
}
-u64 res_counter_uncharge_locked(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val)
-{
- if (WARN_ON(counter->usage < val))
- val = counter->usage;
-
- counter->usage -= val;
- return counter->usage;
-}
-
u64 res_counter_uncharge_until(struct res_counter *counter,
struct res_counter *top,
unsigned long val)
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-05 3:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-05 3:58 [patch 00/11] userspace out of memory handling David Rientjes
2014-03-05 3:58 ` [patch 01/11] fork: collapse copy_flags into copy_process David Rientjes
2014-03-05 3:58 ` [patch 02/11] mm, mempolicy: rename slab_node for clarity David Rientjes
2014-03-05 3:59 ` [patch 03/11] mm, mempolicy: remove per-process flag David Rientjes
2014-03-07 17:20 ` Andi Kleen
2014-03-07 20:48 ` Andrew Morton
2014-03-05 3:59 ` [patch 04/11] mm, memcg: add tunable for oom reserves David Rientjes
2014-03-05 21:17 ` Andrew Morton
2014-03-06 2:53 ` David Rientjes
2014-03-06 21:04 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-05 3:59 ` David Rientjes [this message]
2014-03-05 3:59 ` [patch 06/11] res_counter: add interface for maximum nofail charge David Rientjes
2014-03-05 3:59 ` [patch 07/11] mm, memcg: allow processes handling oom notifications to access reserves David Rientjes
2014-03-06 21:12 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-05 3:59 ` [patch 08/11] mm, memcg: add memcg oom reserve documentation David Rientjes
2014-03-05 3:59 ` [patch 09/11] mm, page_alloc: allow system oom handlers to use memory reserves David Rientjes
2014-03-06 21:13 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-05 3:59 ` [patch 10/11] mm, memcg: add memory.oom_control notification for system oom David Rientjes
2014-03-06 21:15 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-05 3:59 ` [patch 11/11] mm, memcg: allow system oom killer to be disabled David Rientjes
2014-03-06 21:15 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-05 21:17 ` [patch 00/11] userspace out of memory handling Andrew Morton
2014-03-06 2:52 ` David Rientjes
2014-03-11 12:03 ` Jianguo Wu
2014-03-06 20:49 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-06 20:55 ` David Rientjes
2014-03-06 20:59 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-06 21:08 ` David Rientjes
2014-03-06 21:11 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-06 21:23 ` David Rientjes
2014-03-06 21:29 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-06 21:33 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-07 12:23 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1403041955250.8067@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
--to=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=thockin@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=wujianguo@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox