From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@huawei.com>,
Tim Hockin <thockin@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 02/11] mm, mempolicy: rename slab_node for clarity
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 19:58:44 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1403041954220.8067@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1403041952170.8067@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
slab_node() is actually a mempolicy function, so rename it to
mempolicy_slab_node() to make it clearer that it used for processes with
mempolicies.
At the same time, cleanup its code by saving numa_mem_id() in a local
variable (since we require a node with memory, not just any node) and
remove an obsolete comment that assumes the mempolicy is actually passed
into the function.
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
---
include/linux/mempolicy.h | 2 +-
mm/mempolicy.c | 15 ++++++---------
mm/slab.c | 4 ++--
mm/slub.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mempolicy.h b/include/linux/mempolicy.h
--- a/include/linux/mempolicy.h
+++ b/include/linux/mempolicy.h
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ extern struct zonelist *huge_zonelist(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
extern bool init_nodemask_of_mempolicy(nodemask_t *mask);
extern bool mempolicy_nodemask_intersects(struct task_struct *tsk,
const nodemask_t *mask);
-extern unsigned slab_node(void);
+extern unsigned int mempolicy_slab_node(void);
extern enum zone_type policy_zone;
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -1782,21 +1782,18 @@ static unsigned interleave_nodes(struct mempolicy *policy)
/*
* Depending on the memory policy provide a node from which to allocate the
* next slab entry.
- * @policy must be protected by freeing by the caller. If @policy is
- * the current task's mempolicy, this protection is implicit, as only the
- * task can change it's policy. The system default policy requires no
- * such protection.
*/
-unsigned slab_node(void)
+unsigned int mempolicy_slab_node(void)
{
struct mempolicy *policy;
+ int node = numa_mem_id();
if (in_interrupt())
- return numa_node_id();
+ return node;
policy = current->mempolicy;
if (!policy || policy->flags & MPOL_F_LOCAL)
- return numa_node_id();
+ return node;
switch (policy->mode) {
case MPOL_PREFERRED:
@@ -1816,11 +1813,11 @@ unsigned slab_node(void)
struct zonelist *zonelist;
struct zone *zone;
enum zone_type highest_zoneidx = gfp_zone(GFP_KERNEL);
- zonelist = &NODE_DATA(numa_node_id())->node_zonelists[0];
+ zonelist = &NODE_DATA(node)->node_zonelists[0];
(void)first_zones_zonelist(zonelist, highest_zoneidx,
&policy->v.nodes,
&zone);
- return zone ? zone->node : numa_node_id();
+ return zone ? zone->node : node;
}
default:
diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -3042,7 +3042,7 @@ static void *alternate_node_alloc(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t flags)
if (cpuset_do_slab_mem_spread() && (cachep->flags & SLAB_MEM_SPREAD))
nid_alloc = cpuset_slab_spread_node();
else if (current->mempolicy)
- nid_alloc = slab_node();
+ nid_alloc = mempolicy_slab_node();
if (nid_alloc != nid_here)
return ____cache_alloc_node(cachep, flags, nid_alloc);
return NULL;
@@ -3074,7 +3074,7 @@ static void *fallback_alloc(struct kmem_cache *cache, gfp_t flags)
retry_cpuset:
cpuset_mems_cookie = get_mems_allowed();
- zonelist = node_zonelist(slab_node(), flags);
+ zonelist = node_zonelist(mempolicy_slab_node(), flags);
retry:
/*
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1685,7 +1685,7 @@ static void *get_any_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags,
do {
cpuset_mems_cookie = get_mems_allowed();
- zonelist = node_zonelist(slab_node(), flags);
+ zonelist = node_zonelist(mempolicy_slab_node(), flags);
for_each_zone_zonelist(zone, z, zonelist, high_zoneidx) {
struct kmem_cache_node *n;
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-05 3:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-05 3:58 [patch 00/11] userspace out of memory handling David Rientjes
2014-03-05 3:58 ` [patch 01/11] fork: collapse copy_flags into copy_process David Rientjes
2014-03-05 3:58 ` David Rientjes [this message]
2014-03-05 3:59 ` [patch 03/11] mm, mempolicy: remove per-process flag David Rientjes
2014-03-07 17:20 ` Andi Kleen
2014-03-07 20:48 ` Andrew Morton
2014-03-05 3:59 ` [patch 04/11] mm, memcg: add tunable for oom reserves David Rientjes
2014-03-05 21:17 ` Andrew Morton
2014-03-06 2:53 ` David Rientjes
2014-03-06 21:04 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-05 3:59 ` [patch 05/11] res_counter: remove interface for locked charging and uncharging David Rientjes
2014-03-05 3:59 ` [patch 06/11] res_counter: add interface for maximum nofail charge David Rientjes
2014-03-05 3:59 ` [patch 07/11] mm, memcg: allow processes handling oom notifications to access reserves David Rientjes
2014-03-06 21:12 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-05 3:59 ` [patch 08/11] mm, memcg: add memcg oom reserve documentation David Rientjes
2014-03-05 3:59 ` [patch 09/11] mm, page_alloc: allow system oom handlers to use memory reserves David Rientjes
2014-03-06 21:13 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-05 3:59 ` [patch 10/11] mm, memcg: add memory.oom_control notification for system oom David Rientjes
2014-03-06 21:15 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-05 3:59 ` [patch 11/11] mm, memcg: allow system oom killer to be disabled David Rientjes
2014-03-06 21:15 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-05 21:17 ` [patch 00/11] userspace out of memory handling Andrew Morton
2014-03-06 2:52 ` David Rientjes
2014-03-11 12:03 ` Jianguo Wu
2014-03-06 20:49 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-06 20:55 ` David Rientjes
2014-03-06 20:59 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-06 21:08 ` David Rientjes
2014-03-06 21:11 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-06 21:23 ` David Rientjes
2014-03-06 21:29 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-06 21:33 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-07 12:23 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1403041954220.8067@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
--to=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=thockin@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=wujianguo@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox