Re: [RFC PATCH V5] mm readahead: Fix readahead fail for no local memory and limit readahead pages

[David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>]

On Mon, 10 Feb 2014, Raghavendra K T wrote:

> So I understood that you are suggesting implementations like below
> 
> 1) I do not have problem with the below approach, I could post this in
> next version.
> ( But this did not include 4k limit Linus mentioned to apply)
> 
> unsigned long max_sane_readahead(unsigned long nr)
> {
>         unsigned long local_free_page;
>         int nid;
> 
>         nid = numa_mem_id();
> 
>         /*
>          * We sanitize readahead size depending on free memory in
>          * the local node.
>          */
>         local_free_page = node_page_state(nid, NR_INACTIVE_FILE)
>                           + node_page_state(nid, NR_FREE_PAGES);
>         return min(nr, local_free_page / 2);
> }
> 
> 2) I did not go for below because Honza (Jan Kara) had some
> concerns for 4k limit for normal case, and since I am not
> the expert, I was waiting for opinions.
> 
> unsigned long max_sane_readahead(unsigned long nr)
> {
>         unsigned long local_free_page, sane_nr;
>         int nid;
> 
>         nid = numa_mem_id();
> 	/* limit the max readahead to 4k pages */
> 	sane_nr = min(nr, MAX_REMOTE_READAHEAD);
> 
>         /*
>          * We sanitize readahead size depending on free memory in
>          * the local node.
>          */
>         local_free_page = node_page_state(nid, NR_INACTIVE_FILE)
>                           + node_page_state(nid, NR_FREE_PAGES);
>         return min(sane_nr, local_free_page / 2);
> }
> 

I have no opinion on the 4KB pages, either of the above is just fine.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>