From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>,
Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>, Hedi Berriche <hedi@sgi.com>,
Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Move the memory_notifier out of the memory_hotplug lock
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 15:20:07 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402051512490.24489@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52F2C4F0.6080608@sgi.com>
On Wed, 5 Feb 2014, Nathan Zimmer wrote:
> > That looks a little problematic, what happens if a nid is being brought
> > online and a registered callback does something like allocate resources
> > for the arg->status_change_nid and the above two hunks of this patch end
> > up racing?
> >
> > Before, a registered callback would be guaranteed to see either a
> > MEMORY_CANCEL_ONLINE or MEMORY_ONLINE after it has already done
> > MEMORY_GOING_ONLINE.
> >
> > With your patch, we could race and see one cpu doing MEMORY_GOING_ONLINE,
> > another cpu doing MEMORY_GOING_ONLINE, and then MEMORY_ONLINE and
> > MEMORY_CANCEL_ONLINE in either order.
> >
> > So I think this patch will break most registered callbacks that actually
> > depend on lock_memory_hotplug(), it's a coarse lock for that reason.
>
> Since the argument being passed in is the pfn and size it would be an issue
> only if two threads attepted to online the same piece of memory. Right?
>
No, I'm referring to registered callbacks that provide a resource for
arg->status_change_nid. An example would be the callbacks I added to the
slub allocator in slab_memory_callback(). If we are now able to get a
racy MEM_GOING_ONLINE -> MEM_GOING_ONLINE -> MEM_ONLINE ->
MEM_CANCEL_ONLINE, which is possible with your patch _and_ the node being
successfully onlined at the end, then we get a NULL pointer dereference
because the kmem_cache_node for each slab cache has been freed.
> That seems very unlikely but if it can happen it needs to be protected
> against.
>
The protection for registered memory online or offline callbacks is
lock_memory_hotplug() which is eliminated with your patch, the locking for
memory_notify() that you're citing is irrelevant.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-05 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-05 16:29 Nathan Zimmer
2014-02-05 20:29 ` David Rientjes
2014-02-05 23:10 ` Nathan Zimmer
2014-02-05 23:20 ` David Rientjes [this message]
2014-02-06 16:09 ` Nathan Zimmer
2014-02-07 9:30 ` Jiang Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1402051512490.24489@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
--to=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hedi@sgi.com \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=nzimmer@sgi.com \
--cc=qiuxishi@huawei.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox