From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [patch] mm, page_alloc: make __GFP_NOFAIL really not fail
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 13:56:37 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1312091355360.11026@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
__GFP_NOFAIL specifies that the page allocator cannot fail to return
memory. Allocators that call it may not even check for NULL upon
returning.
It turns out GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOFAIL or GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOFAIL can
actually return NULL. More interestingly, processes that are doing
direct reclaim and have PF_MEMALLOC set may also return NULL for any
__GFP_NOFAIL allocation.
This patch fixes it so that the page allocator never actually returns
NULL as expected for __GFP_NOFAIL. It turns out that no code actually
does anything as crazy as GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOFAIL currently, so this
is more for correctness than a bug fix for that issue.
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2535,17 +2535,19 @@ rebalance:
}
}
- /* Atomic allocations - we can't balance anything */
- if (!wait)
- goto nopage;
-
- /* Avoid recursion of direct reclaim */
- if (current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC)
- goto nopage;
-
- /* Avoid allocations with no watermarks from looping endlessly */
- if (test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE) && !(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL))
- goto nopage;
+ if (likely(!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL))) {
+ /* Atomic allocations - we can't balance anything */
+ if (!wait)
+ goto nopage;
+
+ /* Avoid recursion of direct reclaim */
+ if (current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC)
+ goto nopage;
+
+ /* Avoid allocations with no watermarks from looping forever */
+ if (test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE))
+ goto nopage;
+ }
/*
* Try direct compaction. The first pass is asynchronous. Subsequent
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2013-12-09 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-09 21:56 David Rientjes [this message]
2013-12-09 23:22 ` Andrew Morton
2013-12-10 23:20 ` David Rientjes
2013-12-10 23:39 ` Andrew Morton
2013-12-11 0:11 ` David Rientjes
2013-12-12 1:07 ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-11 0:19 ` [patch alternative] mm, page_alloc: warn for non-blockable __GFP_NOFAIL allocation failure David Rientjes
2013-12-11 0:26 ` [patch] checkpatch: add warning of future __GFP_NOFAIL use David Rientjes
2013-12-11 1:35 ` Joe Perches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1312091355360.11026@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
--to=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox