linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 3/8] mm, mempolicy: remove per-process flag
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 21:20:01 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1312032117490.29733@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1312032116440.29733@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

PF_MEMPOLICY is an unnecessary optimization for CONFIG_SLAB users.
There's no significant performance degradation to checking
current->mempolicy rather than current->flags & PF_MEMPOLICY in the
allocation path, especially since this is considered unlikely().

Per-process flags are a scarce resource so we should free them up
whenever possible and make them available.  We'll be using it shortly for
memcg oom reserves.

Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
---
 include/linux/mempolicy.h |  5 -----
 include/linux/sched.h     |  1 -
 kernel/fork.c             |  1 -
 mm/mempolicy.c            | 31 -------------------------------
 mm/slab.c                 |  4 ++--
 5 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mempolicy.h b/include/linux/mempolicy.h
--- a/include/linux/mempolicy.h
+++ b/include/linux/mempolicy.h
@@ -143,7 +143,6 @@ extern void numa_policy_init(void);
 extern void mpol_rebind_task(struct task_struct *tsk, const nodemask_t *new,
 				enum mpol_rebind_step step);
 extern void mpol_rebind_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, nodemask_t *new);
-extern void mpol_fix_fork_child_flag(struct task_struct *p);
 
 extern struct zonelist *huge_zonelist(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 				unsigned long addr, gfp_t gfp_flags,
@@ -266,10 +265,6 @@ static inline void mpol_rebind_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, nodemask_t *new)
 {
 }
 
-static inline void mpol_fix_fork_child_flag(struct task_struct *p)
-{
-}
-
 static inline struct zonelist *huge_zonelist(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 				unsigned long addr, gfp_t gfp_flags,
 				struct mempolicy **mpol, nodemask_t **nodemask)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1695,7 +1695,6 @@ extern void thread_group_cputime_adjusted(struct task_struct *p, cputime_t *ut,
 #define PF_SPREAD_SLAB	0x02000000	/* Spread some slab caches over cpuset */
 #define PF_NO_SETAFFINITY 0x04000000	/* Userland is not allowed to meddle with cpus_allowed */
 #define PF_MCE_EARLY    0x08000000      /* Early kill for mce process policy */
-#define PF_MEMPOLICY	0x10000000	/* Non-default NUMA mempolicy */
 #define PF_MUTEX_TESTER	0x20000000	/* Thread belongs to the rt mutex tester */
 #define PF_FREEZER_SKIP	0x40000000	/* Freezer should not count it as freezable */
 #define PF_SUSPEND_TASK 0x80000000      /* this thread called freeze_processes and should not be frozen */
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1261,7 +1261,6 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags,
 		p->mempolicy = NULL;
 		goto bad_fork_cleanup_cgroup;
 	}
-	mpol_fix_fork_child_flag(p);
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPUSETS
 	p->cpuset_mem_spread_rotor = NUMA_NO_NODE;
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -796,36 +796,6 @@ static int mbind_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
 	return err;
 }
 
-/*
- * Update task->flags PF_MEMPOLICY bit: set iff non-default
- * mempolicy.  Allows more rapid checking of this (combined perhaps
- * with other PF_* flag bits) on memory allocation hot code paths.
- *
- * If called from outside this file, the task 'p' should -only- be
- * a newly forked child not yet visible on the task list, because
- * manipulating the task flags of a visible task is not safe.
- *
- * The above limitation is why this routine has the funny name
- * mpol_fix_fork_child_flag().
- *
- * It is also safe to call this with a task pointer of current,
- * which the static wrapper mpol_set_task_struct_flag() does,
- * for use within this file.
- */
-
-void mpol_fix_fork_child_flag(struct task_struct *p)
-{
-	if (p->mempolicy)
-		p->flags |= PF_MEMPOLICY;
-	else
-		p->flags &= ~PF_MEMPOLICY;
-}
-
-static void mpol_set_task_struct_flag(void)
-{
-	mpol_fix_fork_child_flag(current);
-}
-
 /* Set the process memory policy */
 static long do_set_mempolicy(unsigned short mode, unsigned short flags,
 			     nodemask_t *nodes)
@@ -862,7 +832,6 @@ static long do_set_mempolicy(unsigned short mode, unsigned short flags,
 	}
 	old = current->mempolicy;
 	current->mempolicy = new;
-	mpol_set_task_struct_flag();
 	if (new && new->mode == MPOL_INTERLEAVE &&
 	    nodes_weight(new->v.nodes))
 		current->il_next = first_node(new->v.nodes);
diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -3027,7 +3027,7 @@ out:
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
 /*
- * Try allocating on another node if PF_SPREAD_SLAB|PF_MEMPOLICY.
+ * Try allocating on another node if PF_SPREAD_SLAB is a mempolicy is set.
  *
  * If we are in_interrupt, then process context, including cpusets and
  * mempolicy, may not apply and should not be used for allocation policy.
@@ -3259,7 +3259,7 @@ __do_cache_alloc(struct kmem_cache *cache, gfp_t flags)
 {
 	void *objp;
 
-	if (unlikely(current->flags & (PF_SPREAD_SLAB | PF_MEMPOLICY))) {
+	if (current->mempolicy || unlikely(current->flags & PF_SPREAD_SLAB)) {
 		objp = alternate_node_alloc(cache, flags);
 		if (objp)
 			goto out;

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-12-04  5:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-19 13:14 user defined OOM policies Michal Hocko
2013-11-19 13:40 ` Michal Hocko
2013-11-20  8:02   ` David Rientjes
2013-11-20 15:22     ` Michal Hocko
2013-11-20 17:14       ` Luigi Semenzato
2013-11-21  3:36         ` David Rientjes
2013-11-21  7:03           ` Luigi Semenzato
2013-11-22 18:08             ` Johannes Weiner
2013-11-28 11:36               ` Michal Hocko
2013-11-26  1:29             ` David Rientjes
2013-11-28 11:42               ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-02 23:09                 ` David Rientjes
2013-11-21  3:33       ` David Rientjes
2013-11-28 11:54         ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-02 23:07           ` David Rientjes
2013-12-04  5:19             ` [patch 1/8] fork: collapse copy_flags into copy_process David Rientjes
2013-12-04  5:19               ` [patch 2/8] mm, mempolicy: rename slab_node for clarity David Rientjes
2013-12-04 15:21                 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-12-04  5:20               ` David Rientjes [this message]
2013-12-04 15:24                 ` [patch 3/8] mm, mempolicy: remove per-process flag Christoph Lameter
2013-12-05  0:53                   ` David Rientjes
2013-12-05 19:05                     ` Christoph Lameter
2013-12-05 23:53                       ` David Rientjes
2013-12-06 14:46                         ` Christoph Lameter
2013-12-04  5:20               ` [patch 4/8] mm, memcg: add tunable for oom reserves David Rientjes
2013-12-04  5:20               ` [patch 5/8] res_counter: remove interface for locked charging and uncharging David Rientjes
2013-12-04  5:20               ` [patch 6/8] res_counter: add interface for maximum nofail charge David Rientjes
2013-12-04  5:20               ` [patch 7/8] mm, memcg: allow processes handling oom notifications to access reserves David Rientjes
2013-12-04  5:45                 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-12-05  1:49                   ` David Rientjes
2013-12-05  2:50                     ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-05 23:49                       ` David Rientjes
2013-12-06 17:34                         ` Johannes Weiner
2013-12-07 16:38                           ` Tim Hockin
2013-12-07 17:40                             ` Johannes Weiner
2013-12-07 18:12                               ` Tim Hockin
2013-12-07 19:06                                 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-12-07 21:04                                   ` Tim Hockin
2013-12-06 19:01                         ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-09 20:10                           ` David Rientjes
2013-12-09 22:37                             ` Johannes Weiner
2013-12-10 21:50                             ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-10 23:55                               ` David Rientjes
2013-12-11  9:49                                 ` Mel Gorman
2013-12-11 12:42                                 ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-12  5:37                                   ` Tim Hockin
2013-12-12 14:21                                     ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-12 16:32                                       ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-12 16:37                                         ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-12 18:42                                       ` Tim Hockin
2013-12-12 19:23                                         ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-13  0:23                                           ` Tim Hockin
2013-12-13 11:47                                             ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-04  5:20               ` [patch 8/8] mm, memcg: add memcg oom reserve documentation David Rientjes
2013-11-20 17:25     ` user defined OOM policies Vladimir Murzin
2013-11-20 17:21   ` Vladimir Murzin
2013-11-20 17:33     ` Michal Hocko
2013-11-21  3:38       ` David Rientjes
2013-11-21 17:13         ` Michal Hocko
2013-11-26  1:36           ` David Rientjes
2013-11-22  7:28       ` Vladimir Murzin
2013-11-22 13:18         ` Michal Hocko
2013-11-20  7:50 ` David Rientjes
2013-11-22  0:19 ` Jörn Engel
2013-11-26  1:31   ` David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1312032117490.29733@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
    --to=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox