From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx131.postini.com [74.125.245.131]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5306D6B004D for ; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 10:50:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 09:14:01 -0500 (CDT) From: "Christoph Lameter (Open Source)" Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] mm: Restructure kmem_cache_create() to move debug cache integrity checks into a new function In-Reply-To: <1344272614.2486.40.camel@lorien2> Message-ID: References: <1342221125.17464.8.camel@lorien2> <1344224494.3053.5.camel@lorien2> <1344266096.2486.17.camel@lorien2> <1344272614.2486.40.camel@lorien2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Shuah Khan Cc: JoonSoo Kim , Pekka Enberg , glommer@parallels.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , David Rientjes , shuahkhan@gmail.com On Mon, 6 Aug 2012, Shuah Khan wrote: > No reason, just something I am used to doing :) inline is a good idea. I > can fix that easily and send v2 patch. Leave that to the compiler. There is no performance reason that would give a benefit from forcing inline. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org