From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx138.postini.com [74.125.245.138]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E2F86B0070 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 17:28:20 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-da0-f41.google.com with SMTP id i14so3188599dad.14 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:28:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:28:17 -0800 (PST) From: David Rientjes Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] mm, oom: fix race when specifying a thread as the oom origin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20121108155112.GN31821@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Thiago Farina Cc: Michal Hocko , Andrew Morton , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , KOSAKI Motohiro , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Anton Vorontsov , Oleg Nesterov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Thiago Farina wrote: > > I didn't like the previous playing with the oom_score_adj and what you > > propose looks much nicer. > > Maybe s/oom_task_origin/task_oom_origin/ would be a better fit > May be s/oom_task_origin/is_task_origin_oom? Just my 2 cents. > I like to prefix oom killer functions in the global namespace with "oom_" -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org