From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@google.com>
Subject: [patch] mm, oom: allow exiting threads to have access to memory reserves
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 14:58:18 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1211011451480.19373@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1211011448490.19373@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Exiting threads, those with PF_EXITING set, can pagefault and require
memory before they can make forward progress. This happens, for instance,
when a process must fault task->robust_list, a userspace structure, before
detaching its memory.
These threads also aren't guaranteed to get access to memory reserves
unless oom killed or killed from userspace. The oom killer won't grant
memory reserves if other threads are also exiting other than current and
stalling at the same point. This prevents needlessly killing processes
when others are already exiting.
Instead of special casing all the possible sitations between PF_EXITING
getting set and a thread detaching its mm where it may allocate memory,
which probably wouldn't get updated when a change is made to the exit
path, the solution is to give all exiting threads access to memory
reserves if they call the oom killer. This allows them to quickly
allocate, detach its mm, and free the memory it represents.
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
---
This is old code and has only recently been reported as causing an issue,
so deferring to 3.8 seems appropriate.
mm/oom_kill.c | 31 +++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 79e0f3e..7e9e911 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -310,26 +310,13 @@ enum oom_scan_t oom_scan_process_thread(struct task_struct *task,
if (!task->mm)
return OOM_SCAN_CONTINUE;
- if (task->flags & PF_EXITING) {
+ if (task->flags & PF_EXITING && !force_kill) {
/*
- * If task is current and is in the process of releasing memory,
- * allow the "kill" to set TIF_MEMDIE, which will allow it to
- * access memory reserves. Otherwise, it may stall forever.
- *
- * The iteration isn't broken here, however, in case other
- * threads are found to have already been oom killed.
+ * If this task is not being ptraced on exit, then wait for it
+ * to finish before killing some other task unnecessarily.
*/
- if (task == current)
- return OOM_SCAN_SELECT;
- else if (!force_kill) {
- /*
- * If this task is not being ptraced on exit, then wait
- * for it to finish before killing some other task
- * unnecessarily.
- */
- if (!(task->group_leader->ptrace & PT_TRACE_EXIT))
- return OOM_SCAN_ABORT;
- }
+ if (!(task->group_leader->ptrace & PT_TRACE_EXIT))
+ return OOM_SCAN_ABORT;
}
return OOM_SCAN_OK;
}
@@ -706,11 +693,11 @@ void out_of_memory(struct zonelist *zonelist, gfp_t gfp_mask,
return;
/*
- * If current has a pending SIGKILL, then automatically select it. The
- * goal is to allow it to allocate so that it may quickly exit and free
- * its memory.
+ * If current has a pending SIGKILL or is exiting, then automatically
+ * select it. The goal is to allow it to allocate so that it may
+ * quickly exit and free its memory.
*/
- if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
+ if (fatal_signal_pending(current) || current->flags & PF_EXITING) {
set_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE);
return;
}
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-01 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-28 17:32 zram OOM behavior Luigi Semenzato
2012-10-03 13:30 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
[not found] ` <CAA25o9SwO209DD6CUx-LzhMt9XU6niGJ-fBPmgwfcrUvf0BPWA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-10-12 23:30 ` Luigi Semenzato
2012-10-15 14:44 ` Minchan Kim
2012-10-15 18:54 ` Luigi Semenzato
2012-10-16 6:18 ` Minchan Kim
2012-10-16 17:36 ` Luigi Semenzato
2012-10-19 17:49 ` Luigi Semenzato
2012-10-22 23:53 ` Minchan Kim
2012-10-23 0:40 ` Luigi Semenzato
2012-10-23 6:03 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-29 18:26 ` Luigi Semenzato
2012-10-29 19:00 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-29 22:36 ` Luigi Semenzato
2012-10-29 22:52 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-29 23:23 ` Luigi Semenzato
2012-10-29 23:34 ` Luigi Semenzato
2012-10-30 0:18 ` Minchan Kim
2012-10-30 0:45 ` Luigi Semenzato
2012-10-30 5:41 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-30 19:12 ` Luigi Semenzato
2012-10-30 20:30 ` Luigi Semenzato
2012-10-30 22:32 ` Luigi Semenzato
2012-10-31 18:42 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-30 22:37 ` Sonny Rao
2012-10-31 4:46 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-31 6:14 ` Luigi Semenzato
2012-10-31 6:28 ` Luigi Semenzato
2012-10-31 18:45 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-31 0:57 ` Minchan Kim
2012-10-31 1:06 ` Luigi Semenzato
2012-10-31 1:27 ` Minchan Kim
2012-10-31 3:49 ` Luigi Semenzato
2012-10-31 7:24 ` Minchan Kim
2012-10-31 16:07 ` Luigi Semenzato
2012-10-31 17:49 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2012-10-31 18:54 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-31 21:40 ` Luigi Semenzato
2012-11-01 2:11 ` Minchan Kim
2012-11-01 4:38 ` David Rientjes
2012-11-01 5:18 ` Minchan Kim
2012-11-01 2:43 ` Minchan Kim
2012-11-01 4:48 ` David Rientjes
2012-11-01 5:26 ` Minchan Kim
2012-11-01 8:28 ` Mel Gorman
2012-11-01 15:57 ` Luigi Semenzato
2012-11-01 15:58 ` Luigi Semenzato
2012-11-01 21:48 ` David Rientjes
2012-11-01 17:50 ` Luigi Semenzato
2012-11-01 21:50 ` David Rientjes
2012-11-01 21:58 ` David Rientjes [this message]
2012-11-01 22:43 ` [patch] mm, oom: allow exiting threads to have access to memory reserves Andrew Morton
2012-11-01 23:05 ` David Rientjes
2012-11-01 23:06 ` Luigi Semenzato
2012-11-01 22:04 ` zram OOM behavior Luigi Semenzato
2012-11-01 22:25 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1211011451480.19373@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
--to=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=semenzato@google.com \
--cc=sonnyrao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox