From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
To: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Keping Chen <chenkeping@huawei.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] mm: make consistent use of PG_slab flag
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 12:37:41 -0500 (CDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1207051236310.8670@router.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FF5BD9D.9040101@gmail.com>
On Fri, 6 Jul 2012, Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 07/05/2012 10:47 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Jiang Liu wrote:
> >
> >> PG_slabobject: mark whether a (compound) page hosts SLUB/SLOB objects.
> >
> > Any subsystem may allocate a compound page to store metadata.
> >
> > The compound pages used by SLOB and SLUB are not managed in any way but
> > the calls to kfree and kmalloc are converted to calls to the page
> > allocator. There is no "management" by the slab allocators for these
> > cases and its inaccurate to say that these are SLUB/SLOB objects since the
> > allocators never deal with these objects.
> >
> Hi Chris,
> I think there's a little difference with SLUB and SLOB for compound page.
> For SLOB, it relies on the page allocator to allocate compound page to fulfill
> request bigger than one page. For SLUB, it relies on the page allocator if the
> request is bigger than two pages. So SLUB may allocate a 2-pages compound page
> to host SLUB managed objects.
> My proposal may be summarized as below:
> 1) PG_slab flag marks a memory object is allocated from slab allocator.
> 2) PG_slabobject marks a (compound) page hosts SLUB/SLOB managed objects.
> 3) Only set PG_slab/PG_slabobject on the head page of compound pages.
> 4) For SLAB, PG_slabobject is redundant and so not used.
>
> A summary of proposed usage of PG_slab(S) and PG_slabobject(O) with
> SLAB/SLUB/SLOB allocators as below:
> pagesize SLAB SLUB SLOB
> 1page S S,O S,O
> 2page S S,O S
> >=4page S S S
There is no point of recognizing such objects because those will be
kmalloc objects and they can only be freed in a subsystem specific way.
There is no standard way to even figure out which subsystem allocated
them. So for all practical purposes those are unrecoverable.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-05 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-03 3:57 [RFC PATCH 1/4] mm: introduce a safer interface to check whether a page is managed by SLxB Jiang Liu
2012-07-03 3:57 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] mm: make consistent use of PG_slab flag Jiang Liu
2012-07-05 14:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-07-05 16:15 ` Jiang Liu
2012-07-05 17:37 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2012-07-06 8:30 ` Jiang Liu
2012-07-06 13:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-07-03 3:57 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] SLAB: minor code cleanup Jiang Liu
2012-07-03 10:02 ` Cong Wang
2012-07-03 3:57 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] mm: change slob's struct page definition to accomodate struct page changes Jiang Liu
2012-07-03 10:22 ` Cong Wang
2012-07-03 9:56 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] mm: introduce a safer interface to check whether a page is managed by SLxB Cong Wang
2012-07-05 14:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-07-05 15:55 ` Jiang Liu
2012-07-05 17:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-07-06 7:29 ` Jiang Liu
2012-07-06 13:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-07-06 15:36 ` Jiang Liu
2012-09-04 9:18 ` Wen Congyang
2012-09-04 12:13 ` Jiang Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1207051236310.8670@router.home \
--to=cl@linux.com \
--cc=chenkeping@huawei.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox