From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
devel@openvz.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] kmem slab accounting basic infrastructure
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 21:22:38 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1206252121140.26640@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340633728-12785-5-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com>
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 9352d40..6f34b77 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -265,6 +265,10 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
> };
>
> /*
> + * the counter to account for kernel memory usage.
> + */
> + struct res_counter kmem;
> + /*
> * Per cgroup active and inactive list, similar to the
> * per zone LRU lists.
> */
> @@ -279,6 +283,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
> * Should the accounting and control be hierarchical, per subtree?
> */
> bool use_hierarchy;
> + bool kmem_accounted;
>
> bool oom_lock;
> atomic_t under_oom;
> @@ -391,6 +396,7 @@ enum res_type {
> _MEM,
> _MEMSWAP,
> _OOM_TYPE,
> + _KMEM,
> };
>
> #define MEMFILE_PRIVATE(x, val) ((x) << 16 | (val))
> @@ -1438,6 +1444,10 @@ done:
> res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_USAGE) >> 10,
> res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_LIMIT) >> 10,
> res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_FAILCNT));
> + printk(KERN_INFO "kmem: usage %llukB, limit %llukB, failcnt %llu\n",
> + res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->kmem, RES_USAGE) >> 10,
> + res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->kmem, RES_LIMIT) >> 10,
> + res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->kmem, RES_FAILCNT));
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -3879,6 +3889,11 @@ static ssize_t mem_cgroup_read(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft,
> else
> val = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, name);
> break;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM
> + case _KMEM:
> + val = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->kmem, name);
> + break;
> +#endif
This shouldn't need an #ifdef, ->kmem is available on all
CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR kernels. Same with several of the other
instances in this patch.
Can't these instances be addressed by not adding kmem_cgroup_files without
CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM?
> default:
> BUG();
> }
> @@ -3916,8 +3931,26 @@ static int mem_cgroup_write(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft,
> break;
> if (type == _MEM)
> ret = mem_cgroup_resize_limit(memcg, val);
> - else
> + else if (type == _MEMSWAP)
> ret = mem_cgroup_resize_memsw_limit(memcg, val);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM
> + else if (type == _KMEM) {
> + ret = res_counter_set_limit(&memcg->kmem, val);
> + if (ret)
> + break;
> + /*
> + * Once enabled, can't be disabled. We could in theory
> + * disable it if we haven't yet created any caches, or
> + * if we can shrink them all to death.
> + *
> + * But it is not worth the trouble
> + */
> + if (!memcg->kmem_accounted && val != RESOURCE_MAX)
> + memcg->kmem_accounted = true;
> + }
> +#endif
> + else
> + return -EINVAL;
> break;
> case RES_SOFT_LIMIT:
> ret = res_counter_memparse_write_strategy(buffer, &val);
> @@ -3982,12 +4015,20 @@ static int mem_cgroup_reset(struct cgroup *cont, unsigned int event)
> case RES_MAX_USAGE:
> if (type == _MEM)
> res_counter_reset_max(&memcg->res);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM
> + else if (type == _KMEM)
> + res_counter_reset_max(&memcg->kmem);
> +#endif
> else
> res_counter_reset_max(&memcg->memsw);
> break;
> case RES_FAILCNT:
> if (type == _MEM)
> res_counter_reset_failcnt(&memcg->res);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM
> + else if (type == _KMEM)
> + res_counter_reset_failcnt(&memcg->kmem);
> +#endif
> else
> res_counter_reset_failcnt(&memcg->memsw);
> break;
> @@ -4549,6 +4590,33 @@ static int mem_cgroup_oom_control_write(struct cgroup *cgrp,
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM
> +static struct cftype kmem_cgroup_files[] = {
> + {
> + .name = "kmem.limit_in_bytes",
> + .private = MEMFILE_PRIVATE(_KMEM, RES_LIMIT),
> + .write_string = mem_cgroup_write,
> + .read = mem_cgroup_read,
> + },
> + {
> + .name = "kmem.usage_in_bytes",
> + .private = MEMFILE_PRIVATE(_KMEM, RES_USAGE),
> + .read = mem_cgroup_read,
> + },
> + {
> + .name = "kmem.failcnt",
> + .private = MEMFILE_PRIVATE(_KMEM, RES_FAILCNT),
> + .trigger = mem_cgroup_reset,
> + .read = mem_cgroup_read,
> + },
> + {
> + .name = "kmem.max_usage_in_bytes",
> + .private = MEMFILE_PRIVATE(_KMEM, RES_MAX_USAGE),
> + .trigger = mem_cgroup_reset,
> + .read = mem_cgroup_read,
> + },
> + {},
> +};
> +
> static int memcg_init_kmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct cgroup_subsys *ss)
> {
> return mem_cgroup_sockets_init(memcg, ss);
> @@ -4892,6 +4960,12 @@ mem_cgroup_create(struct cgroup *cont)
> int cpu;
> enable_swap_cgroup();
> parent = NULL;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM
> + WARN_ON(cgroup_add_cftypes(&mem_cgroup_subsys,
> + kmem_cgroup_files));
> +#endif
> +
> if (mem_cgroup_soft_limit_tree_init())
> goto free_out;
> root_mem_cgroup = memcg;
> @@ -4910,6 +4984,7 @@ mem_cgroup_create(struct cgroup *cont)
> if (parent && parent->use_hierarchy) {
> res_counter_init(&memcg->res, &parent->res);
> res_counter_init(&memcg->memsw, &parent->memsw);
> + res_counter_init(&memcg->kmem, &parent->kmem);
> /*
> * We increment refcnt of the parent to ensure that we can
> * safely access it on res_counter_charge/uncharge.
> @@ -4920,6 +4995,7 @@ mem_cgroup_create(struct cgroup *cont)
> } else {
> res_counter_init(&memcg->res, NULL);
> res_counter_init(&memcg->memsw, NULL);
> + res_counter_init(&memcg->kmem, NULL);
> }
> memcg->last_scanned_node = MAX_NUMNODES;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&memcg->oom_notify);
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-26 4:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-25 14:15 [PATCH 00/11] kmem controller for memcg: stripped down version Glauber Costa
2012-06-25 14:15 ` [PATCH 01/11] memcg: Make it possible to use the stock for more than one page Glauber Costa
2012-06-25 17:44 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-25 22:29 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-25 22:33 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-26 4:01 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-25 14:15 ` [PATCH 02/11] memcg: Reclaim when more than one page needed Glauber Costa
2012-06-25 23:33 ` Suleiman Souhlal
2012-06-26 8:39 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-27 16:16 ` Suleiman Souhlal
2012-06-26 4:09 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-26 7:12 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-26 8:54 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-26 9:08 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-26 9:17 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-26 9:23 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-27 10:03 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-27 19:48 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-27 20:47 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-25 14:15 ` [PATCH 03/11] memcg: change defines to an enum Glauber Costa
2012-06-26 4:11 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-26 8:28 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-26 9:01 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-25 14:15 ` [PATCH 04/11] kmem slab accounting basic infrastructure Glauber Costa
2012-06-26 4:22 ` David Rientjes [this message]
2012-06-26 7:09 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-25 14:15 ` [PATCH 05/11] Add a __GFP_KMEMCG flag Glauber Costa
2012-06-26 4:25 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-26 7:08 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-26 9:03 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-25 14:15 ` [PATCH 06/11] memcg: kmem controller infrastructure Glauber Costa
2012-06-25 18:06 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-25 22:28 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-25 23:17 ` Andrew Morton
2012-06-26 14:40 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-26 15:01 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-26 18:01 ` Andrew Morton
2012-06-26 18:08 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-26 18:14 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-26 19:20 ` Andrew Morton
2012-06-26 15:29 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-26 9:12 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-26 9:17 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-27 4:01 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-27 9:33 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-27 19:46 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-25 14:15 ` [PATCH 07/11] mm: Allocate kernel pages to the right memcg Glauber Costa
2012-06-25 18:07 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-25 22:27 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-25 14:15 ` [PATCH 08/11] memcg: disable kmem code when not in use Glauber Costa
2012-06-26 5:51 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-06-25 14:15 ` [PATCH 09/11] memcg: propagate kmem limiting information to children Glauber Costa
2012-06-25 18:29 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-25 22:36 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-25 22:49 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-25 23:21 ` Andrew Morton
2012-06-26 5:23 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-25 23:23 ` Andrew Morton
2012-06-26 5:24 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-26 5:31 ` Andrew Morton
2012-06-26 7:23 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-25 14:15 ` [PATCH 10/11] memcg: allow a memcg with kmem charges to be destructed Glauber Costa
2012-06-25 18:34 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-25 22:25 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-26 5:59 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-06-26 7:21 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-25 14:15 ` [PATCH 11/11] protect architectures where THREAD_SIZE >= PAGE_SIZE against fork bombs Glauber Costa
2012-06-25 16:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-06-25 18:38 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-25 20:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-06-26 12:48 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-26 13:38 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-06-26 13:37 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-26 13:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-06-26 4:57 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-26 5:35 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-06-26 7:23 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-26 8:45 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-26 8:44 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-26 9:05 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-25 23:27 ` [PATCH 00/11] kmem controller for memcg: stripped down version Andrew Morton
2012-06-26 7:17 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-26 21:55 ` Andrew Morton
2012-06-27 1:08 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-27 8:39 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-27 9:29 ` Fork bomb limitation in memcg WAS: " Glauber Costa
2012-06-27 12:29 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-06-27 12:28 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-27 12:35 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-06-27 19:38 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-28 9:01 ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-28 22:25 ` Andrew Morton
2012-07-03 11:38 ` Glauber Costa
2012-07-12 15:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-08-07 13:59 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-08 14:15 ` Glauber Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1206252121140.26640@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
--to=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox