From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mm, thp: abort compaction if migration page cannot be charged to memcg
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:32:00 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1206251726040.1895@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FE8CCCD.7080503@redhat.com>
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Rik van Riel wrote:
> The patch makes sense, however I wonder if it would make
> more sense in the long run to allow migrate/compaction to
> temporarily exceed the memcg memory limit for a cgroup,
> because the original page will get freed again soon anyway.
>
> That has the potential to improve compaction success, and
> reduce compaction related CPU use.
>
Yeah, Kame brought up the same point with a sample patch by allowing the
temporary charge for the new page. It would certainly solve this problem
in a way that we don't have to even touch compaction, it's disappointing
that we have to charge memory to do a page migration. I'm not so sure
about the approach of temporarily allowing the excess charge, however,
since it would scale with the number of cpus doing compaction or
migration, which could end up with PAGE_SIZE * nr_cpu_ids.
I haven't looked at it (yet), but I'm hoping that there's a way to avoid
charging the temporary page at all until after move_to_new_page()
succeeds, i.e. find a way to uncharge page before charging newpage. We
currently don't charge things like vmalloc() memory to things that call
alloc_pages() directly so it seems like it's plausible without causing
usage > limit.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-26 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-21 6:52 David Rientjes
2012-06-21 8:11 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-21 8:30 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-21 9:01 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-21 10:05 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-06-21 10:16 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-21 9:32 ` Mel Gorman
2012-06-21 9:57 ` David Rientjes
2012-06-25 20:40 ` Rik van Riel
2012-06-26 0:32 ` David Rientjes [this message]
2012-06-26 3:11 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1206251726040.1895@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
--to=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox