linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Cristoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Wipe out CFLGS_OFF_SLAB from flags during initial slab creation
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:59:18 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1206210055360.31077@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340225959-1966-3-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com>

On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:

> CFLGS_OFF_SLAB is not a valid flag to be passed to cache creation.
> If we are duplicating a cache - support added in a future patch -
> we will rely on the flags it has stored in itself. That may include
> CFLGS_OFF_SLAB.
> 
> So it is better to clean this flag at cache creation.
> 

I think this should be folded into the patch that allows cache 
duplication, it doesn't make sense to apply right now because 
CFLGS_OFF_SLAB is internal to mm/slab.c and it's not going to be passing 
this to kmem_cache_create() itself yet.

Also, do we care that cache_estimate() uses a formal of type int for flags 
when CFLGS_OFF_SLAB is unsigned long?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-21  7:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-20 20:59 [PATCH 0/4] cache-specific changes for memcg (preparation) Glauber Costa
2012-06-20 20:59 ` [PATCH 1/4] slab: rename gfpflags to allocflags Glauber Costa
2012-06-21  7:53   ` David Rientjes
2012-06-20 20:59 ` [PATCH 2/4] Wipe out CFLGS_OFF_SLAB from flags during initial slab creation Glauber Costa
2012-06-21  7:59   ` David Rientjes [this message]
2012-06-20 20:59 ` [PATCH 3/4] slab: move FULL state transition to an initcall Glauber Costa
2012-06-21  8:01   ` David Rientjes
2012-07-02 10:57     ` Pekka Enberg
2012-06-20 20:59 ` [PATCH 4/4] don't do __ClearPageSlab before freeing slab page Glauber Costa
2012-06-21  8:04   ` David Rientjes
2012-06-21  8:13     ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-21 11:04       ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-06-21 11:14         ` Glauber Costa
2012-06-21 20:24         ` Glauber Costa
2012-07-03 18:42           ` Christoph Lameter
2012-07-03 18:40       ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1206210055360.31077@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
    --to=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=glommer@parallels.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox