From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx161.postini.com [74.125.245.161]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D02D6B009E for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:21:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 08:57:59 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH] hugeltb: Mark hugelb_max_hstate __read_mostly In-Reply-To: <87sjdxm7jd.fsf@skywalker.in.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <1339682178-29059-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20120614141257.GQ27397@tiehlicka.suse.cz> <87sjdxm7jd.fsf@skywalker.in.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Cc: Michal Hocko , linux-mm@kvack.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > But there seems to no need for this patch otherwise someone would have > > verified that the patch has the intended beneficial effect on performance. > > > > The variable is never modified after boot. Thats all? There is no performance gain from this change? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org