Re: [RFC] SL[AUO]B common code 6/9] slabs: Use a common mutex definition

Christoph Lameter
2012-05-16T14:32:04Z

On Wed, 16 May 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:

> Now, won't this hurt performance of the slob allocator, that seems to gain its
> edge from its simplicity ?

Well the cache creation and removal is usually not that performance
critical. Code exists anyway for various other things so we add some
features to SLOB in the process.