From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx176.postini.com [74.125.245.176]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CF936B00EA for ; Wed, 16 May 2012 10:32:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 09:32:01 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [RFC] SL[AUO]B common code 6/9] slabs: Use a common mutex definition In-Reply-To: <4FB36685.4030104@parallels.com> Message-ID: References: <20120514201544.334122849@linux.com> <20120514201612.262732939@linux.com> <4FB36685.4030104@parallels.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Glauber Costa Cc: Pekka Enberg , linux-mm@kvack.org, David Rientjes , Matt Mackall On Wed, 16 May 2012, Glauber Costa wrote: > Now, won't this hurt performance of the slob allocator, that seems to gain its > edge from its simplicity ? Well the cache creation and removal is usually not that performance critical. Code exists anyway for various other things so we add some features to SLOB in the process. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org