linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: object allocation benchmark
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 15:24:25 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1205091523040.5041@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOJsxLEFsT3Ef9ztPnooJF2uSwELpkf90u_1=CtbvGGbO2LOiw@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 839 bytes --]

On Wed, 9 May 2012, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> >> I have some in kernel benchmarking tools for page allocator and slab
> >> allocators. But they are not really clean patches.
> >>
> >
> > This is the latest version of your tools that I have based on 3.3.  Load
> > the modules with insmod and it will produce an error to automatically
> > unloaded (by design) and check dmesg for the results.
> 
> Anyone interested in pushing the benchmark to mainline?
> 

It's a pretty atypical type of a benchmark that must be compiled and 
loaded as a benchmark for the most accurate results, I'm not sure if we 
want to carry it in the kernel or not.  I got these from when Christoph 
initially sent them for your tree.  If there's a renewed interest, let me 
know and I'll send you the ported changes (pagealloc_test.c, slab_test.c, 
and vmstat_test.c).

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-09 22:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-19 14:33 Glauber Costa
2012-03-19 15:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-03-19 20:41   ` David Rientjes
2012-05-09  6:24     ` Pekka Enberg
2012-05-09 22:24       ` David Rientjes [this message]
2012-03-22 14:22   ` Glauber Costa
2012-03-22 16:15     ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1205091523040.5041@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
    --to=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=glommer@parallels.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=suleiman@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox