From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx185.postini.com [74.125.245.185]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0981D6B0044 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:49:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:49:11 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] do_migrate_pages() calls migrate_to_node() even if task is already on a correct node In-Reply-To: <4F75EDC3.7050104@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <4F6B6BFF.1020701@redhat.com> <4F6B7358.60800@gmail.com> <4F6B7854.1040203@redhat.com> <4F74A344.7070805@redhat.com> <4F74BB67.30703@gmail.com> <4F75EDC3.7050104@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Larry Woodman Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro , linux-mm@kvack.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Rik van Riel , Motohiro Kosaki On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, Larry Woodman wrote: > of nodes. > > I would think that the 1-1 movement > > is only useful to do if the number of nodes in both the destination and > > the source is the same. > Agreed, thats exactly what this patch does. are you OK with this change > then??? Please add to the patch description some explanation how this patch changes the way page migration does things. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org