From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx193.postini.com [74.125.245.193]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A23696B004A for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:28:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 10:28:56 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: object allocation benchmark In-Reply-To: <4F6743C2.3090906@parallels.com> Message-ID: References: <4F6743C2.3090906@parallels.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Glauber Costa Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Pekka Enberg , Suleiman Souhlal , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki On Mon, 19 Mar 2012, Glauber Costa wrote: > I was wondering: Which benchmark would be considered the canonical one to > demonstrate the speed of the slub/slab after changes? In particular, I have > the kmem-memcg in mind I have some in kernel benchmarking tools for page allocator and slab allocators. But they are not really clean patches. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org