From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>,
Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com>,
ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Don't warn if memdup_user fails
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:29:10 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1201121418060.1124@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120112135803.1fb98fd6.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I think it's good to fix ecryptfs like Tyler is doing and, at the same
> > time, ensure that the len passed to memdup_user() makes sense prior to
> > kmallocing memory with GFP_KERNEL. Perhaps something like
> >
> > if (WARN_ON(len > PAGE_SIZE << PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER))
> > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >
> > in which case __GFP_NOWARN is irrelevant.
>
> If someone is passing huge size_t's into kmalloc() and getting failures
> then that's probably a bug. So perhaps we should add a warning to
> kmalloc itself if the size_t is out of bounds, and !__GFP_NOWARN.
>
That's already done. For slub, for example, the largest object size
handled by the allocator itself is an order-1 page; everything else gets
passed through to the page allocator and its limitation is MAX_ORDER,
which is the warning that we're seeing in Sasha's changelog when
!__GFP_NOWARN.
> But none of this will be very effective. If someone is passing an
> unchecked size_t into kmalloc then normal testing will not reveal the
> problem because the testers won't pass stupid numbers into their
> syscalls.
>
They'll get the same warning that Sasha got, which is because the page
allocator can't handle larger than MAX_ORDER orders. The intention in my
WARN_ON() above specifically for memdup_user() is to avoid the infinite
loop in the page allocator for GFP_KERNEL allocations where the order
is less than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER and avoid the oom killer. It returns
immediately rather than passing __GFP_NORETRY since we don't want to incur
the side-effects of direct reclaim or compaction as well.
The real fix would be to convert all callers to pass gfp flags into
memdup_user() to determine the behavior they want, though.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-12 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-11 16:50 Sasha Levin
2012-01-11 21:46 ` David Rientjes
2012-01-12 6:43 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-12 6:44 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-12 9:09 ` Li Zefan
2012-01-11 22:12 ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-12 7:12 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-12 8:06 ` Sasha Levin
2012-01-12 8:15 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-12 21:19 ` David Rientjes
2012-01-12 21:58 ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-12 22:29 ` David Rientjes [this message]
2012-01-13 7:17 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-01-13 7:36 ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-12 11:16 ` Tyler Hicks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1201121418060.1124@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
--to=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kirkland@canonical.com \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=tyhicks@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox