From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: leonid.moiseichuk@nokia.com
Cc: gregkh@suse.de, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cesarb@cesarb.net, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com,
emunson@mgebm.net, penberg@kernel.org, aarcange@redhat.com,
riel@redhat.com, mel@csn.ul.ie, dima@android.com,
rebecca@android.com, san@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
vesa.jaaskelainen@nokia.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3.2.0-rc1 3/3] Used Memory Meter pseudo-device module
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 02:09:16 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1201090203470.8480@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84FF21A720B0874AA94B46D76DB9826904554AFD@008-AM1MPN1-003.mgdnok.nokia.com>
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, leonid.moiseichuk@nokia.com wrote:
> 1.1. Pekka Enberg
> > However, from VM point of view, both have the exact same
> > functionality: detect when we reach low memory condition
> > (for some configurable threshold) and notify userspace or kernel
> > subsystem about it.
>
> Well, I cannot say that SIGKILL is a notification. From kernel side
> maybe. But Android OOM uses different memory tracking rules. From my
> opinion OOM killer should be as reliable as default is but functionality
> Android OOM killer does should be done in user space by some "smart
> killer" which closes application correct way (save data, notify user
> etc.). It heavily depends from product design.
>
I'm not sure why you need to detect low memory thresholds if you're not
interested in using the memory controller, why not just use the oom killer
delay that I suggested earlier and allow userspace to respond to
conditions when you are known to failed reclaim and require that something
be killed? Userspace should be able to make sane decisions or trigger
external knobs to be able to free memory much better than having the
kernel handling signals or notification to individual applications.
> 1.7. David Rientjes
> > This is just a side-note but as this information is meant to be consumed by userspace you have the option of hooking
> > into the mm_page_alloc tracepoint. You get the same information about how many pages are allocated or freed. I accept
> > that it will probably be a bit slower but on the plus side it'll be backwards compatible and you don't need a kernel
> > patch for it.
>
I didn't write that.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-09 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-04 17:21 [PATCH 3.2.0-rc1 0/3] Used Memory Meter pseudo-device and related changes in MM Leonid Moiseichuk
2012-01-04 17:21 ` [PATCH 3.2.0-rc1 1/3] Making si_swapinfo exportable Leonid Moiseichuk
2012-01-04 17:21 ` [PATCH 3.2.0-rc1 2/3] MM hook for page allocation and release Leonid Moiseichuk
2012-01-04 20:40 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-05 6:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-01-05 11:26 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-05 12:49 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-05 15:05 ` Rik van Riel
2012-01-05 15:17 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-05 15:22 ` Mel Gorman
2012-01-04 17:21 ` [PATCH 3.2.0-rc1 3/3] Used Memory Meter pseudo-device module Leonid Moiseichuk
2012-01-04 19:55 ` Greg KH
2012-01-09 9:58 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-09 10:09 ` David Rientjes [this message]
2012-01-09 10:19 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-09 20:55 ` David Rientjes
2012-01-11 12:46 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-11 21:44 ` David Rientjes
2012-01-12 8:32 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-12 20:54 ` David Rientjes
2012-01-13 9:34 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-13 11:06 ` David Rientjes
2012-01-13 11:51 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-13 21:35 ` David Rientjes
2012-01-04 19:56 ` [PATCH 3.2.0-rc1 0/3] Used Memory Meter pseudo-device and related changes in MM Greg KH
2012-01-04 20:17 ` Rik van Riel
2012-01-04 20:42 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-05 23:01 ` David Rientjes
2012-01-05 12:22 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-05 11:47 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-05 12:40 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-05 13:02 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-05 14:57 ` Greg KH
2012-01-05 16:13 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-05 23:10 ` David Rientjes
2012-01-09 8:27 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-06 0:26 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-09 8:49 ` leonid.moiseichuk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1201090203470.8480@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
--to=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cesarb@cesarb.net \
--cc=dima@android.com \
--cc=emunson@mgebm.net \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=leonid.moiseichuk@nokia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rebecca@android.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=san@google.com \
--cc=vesa.jaaskelainen@nokia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox