From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail6.bemta8.messagelabs.com (mail6.bemta8.messagelabs.com [216.82.243.55]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907AE6B00AB for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:26:44 -0500 (EST) Received: by ywm14 with SMTP id 14so1322961ywm.14 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:26:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:26:40 -0800 (PST) From: David Rientjes Subject: Re: [patch for-3.2-rc3] cpusets: stall when updating mems_allowed for mempolicy or disjoint nodemask In-Reply-To: <4ECCA578.6020700@cn.fujitsu.com> Message-ID: References: <4EC4C603.8050704@cn.fujitsu.com> <4EC62AEA.2030602@cn.fujitsu.com> <4ECC5FC8.9070500@cn.fujitsu.com> <4ECC7B1E.6020108@cn.fujitsu.com> <4ECCA578.6020700@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Miao Xie Cc: Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , KOSAKI Motohiro , Paul Menage , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Miao Xie wrote: > That nodemask is also protected by get_mems_allowed(). > So what's the problem with the patch? Can I add your acked-by? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org