linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Kees Cook <kees@ubuntu.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: restrict access to slab files under procfs and sysfs
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:21:22 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1109271117200.17876@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110927175453.GA3393@albatros>

On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:

> Historically /proc/slabinfo and files under /sys/kernel/slab/* have
> world read permissions and are accessible to the world.  slabinfo
> contains rather private information related both to the kernel and
> userspace tasks.  Depending on the situation, it might reveal either
> private information per se or information useful to make another
> targeted attack.  Some examples of what can be learned by
> reading/watching for /proc/slabinfo entries:
> 
> 1) dentry (and different *inode*) number might reveal other processes fs
> activity.  The number of dentry "active objects" doesn't strictly show
> file count opened/touched by a process, however, there is a good
> correlation between them.  The patch "proc: force dcache drop on
> unauthorized access" relies on the privacy of dentry count.
> 
> 2) different inode entries might reveal the same information as (1), but
> these are more fine granted counters.  If a filesystem is mounted in a
> private mount point (or even a private namespace) and fs type differs from
> other mounted fs types, fs activity in this mount point/namespace is
> revealed.  If there is a single ecryptfs mount point, the whole fs
> activity of a single user is revealed.  Number of files in ecryptfs
> mount point is a private information per se.
> 
> 3) fuse_* reveals number of files / fs activity of a user in a user
> private mount point.  It is approx. the same severity as ecryptfs
> infoleak in (2).
> 
> 4) sysfs_dir_cache similar to (2) reveals devices' addition/removal,
> which can be otherwise hidden by "chmod 0700 /sys/".  With 0444 slabinfo
> the precise number of sysfs files is known to the world.
> 
> 5) buffer_head might reveal some kernel activity.  With other
> information leaks an attacker might identify what specific kernel
> routines generate buffer_head activity.
> 
> 6) *kmalloc* infoleaks are very situational.  Attacker should watch for
> the specific kmalloc size entry and filter the noise related to the unrelated
> kernel activity.  If an attacker has relatively silent victim system, he
> might get rather precise counters.
> 
> Additional information sources might significantly increase the slabinfo
> infoleak benefits.  E.g. if an attacker knows that the processes
> activity on the system is very low (only core daemons like syslog and
> cron), he may run setxid binaries / trigger local daemon activity /
> trigger network services activity / await sporadic cron jobs activity
> / etc. and get rather precise counters for fs and network activity of
> these privileged tasks, which is unknown otherwise.
> 
> 
> Also hiding slabinfo and /sys/kernel/slab/* is a one step to complicate
> exploitation of kernel heap overflows (and possibly, other bugs).  The
> related discussion:
> 
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1108378
> 
> 
> To keep compatibility with old permission model where non-root
> monitoring daemon could watch for kernel memleaks though slabinfo one
> should do:
> 
>     groupadd slabinfo
>     usermod -a -G slabinfo $MONITOR_USER
> 
> And add the following commands to init scripts (to mountall.conf in
> Ubuntu's upstart case):
> 
>     chmod g+r /proc/slabinfo /sys/kernel/slab/*/*
>     chgrp slabinfo /proc/slabinfo /sys/kernel/slab/*/*
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@ubuntu.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>
> CC: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
> CC: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
> CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> CC: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>

Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-09-27 18:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-27 17:54 Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-09-27 17:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: restrict access to /proc/meminfo Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-09-27 18:27   ` David Rientjes
2011-09-27 19:14     ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-09-27 19:38   ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-09-27 20:03     ` Christoph Lameter
2011-09-27 20:33       ` David Rientjes
2011-09-27 20:47         ` Christoph Lameter
2011-09-28 20:31           ` Dave Hansen
2011-09-28 20:52             ` Alan Cox
2011-09-29  0:43             ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-09-29 14:11               ` Christoph Lameter
2011-09-29 16:18         ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-09-29 16:30           ` Dave Hansen
2011-09-29 16:43             ` [kernel-hardening] " Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-09-29 16:57           ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-09-29 17:25             ` [kernel-hardening] " Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-09-29 17:28           ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-09-28 21:46     ` Andrew Morton
2011-09-30 19:53       ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-09-30 20:03         ` Andrew Morton
2011-09-30 20:12           ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-09-30 20:15           ` Dave Hansen
2011-09-27 18:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: restrict access to slab files under procfs and sysfs Christoph Lameter
2011-09-27 19:16   ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-09-27 19:35     ` Christoph Lameter
2011-09-27 18:21 ` David Rientjes [this message]
2011-09-27 20:00   ` Pekka Enberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1109271117200.17876@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
    --to=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kees@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=segoon@openwall.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox