From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Paul Menage <paul@paulmenage.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch] cpusets: avoid looping when storing to mems_allowed if one node remains set
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:06:04 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1109131503520.11120@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E6EDA2B.9090507@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Miao Xie wrote:
> This patch is dangerous if the task has a bind memory policy that was set
> to be neither MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES nor MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES, because the
> memory policy use node_remap() to rebind the allowed nodes, but node_remap()
> may make the old mask and the new mask nonoverlapping. So at this condition,
> the task may also see an empty node mask.
>
The vast majority of cpuset users are not going to have mempolicies at
all, the cpuset itself is the only policy they need to take advantage of
the NUMA locality of their machine. I'd be find with checking for
!tsk->mempolicy in this exception as well since we already hold
task_lock(tsk), but I think the real fix would be to make sure that an
empty nodemask is never returned by mempolicies. Something like ensuring
that if the preferred node is MAX_NUMNODES (since it is determined by
using first_node() over a possibly racing empty nodemask) that the first
online node is returned during the race and that
node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY] is returned if an MPOL_BIND or MPOL_INTERLEAVE
mask is empty. Thoughts?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-13 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-09 10:15 David Rientjes
2011-09-13 4:20 ` Miao Xie
2011-09-13 22:06 ` David Rientjes [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1109131503520.11120@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
--to=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=paul@paulmenage.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox