From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [patch] oom: remove references to old badness() function
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:57:54 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1106211756580.4454@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
The badness() function in the oom killer was renamed to oom_badness() in
a63d83f427fb ("oom: badness heuristic rewrite") since it is a globally
exported function for clarity.
The prototype for the old function still existed in linux/oom.h, so
remove it. There are no existing users.
Also fixes documentation and comment references to badness() and adjusts
them accordingly.
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
---
Documentation/ABI/obsolete/proc-pid-oom_adj | 2 +-
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 2 +-
include/linux/oom.h | 4 ----
mm/oom_kill.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/obsolete/proc-pid-oom_adj b/Documentation/ABI/obsolete/proc-pid-oom_adj
--- a/Documentation/ABI/obsolete/proc-pid-oom_adj
+++ b/Documentation/ABI/obsolete/proc-pid-oom_adj
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Why: /proc/<pid>/oom_adj allows userspace to influence the oom killer's
A much more powerful interface, /proc/<pid>/oom_score_adj, was
introduced with the oom killer rewrite that allows users to increase or
- decrease the badness() score linearly. This interface will replace
+ decrease the badness score linearly. This interface will replace
/proc/<pid>/oom_adj.
A warning will be emitted to the kernel log if an application uses this
diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
--- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
+++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ Why: /proc/<pid>/oom_adj allows userspace to influence the oom killer's
A much more powerful interface, /proc/<pid>/oom_score_adj, was
introduced with the oom killer rewrite that allows users to increase or
- decrease the badness() score linearly. This interface will replace
+ decrease the badness score linearly. This interface will replace
/proc/<pid>/oom_adj.
A warning will be emitted to the kernel log if an application uses this
diff --git a/include/linux/oom.h b/include/linux/oom.h
--- a/include/linux/oom.h
+++ b/include/linux/oom.h
@@ -64,10 +64,6 @@ static inline void oom_killer_enable(void)
oom_killer_disabled = false;
}
-/* The badness from the OOM killer */
-extern unsigned long badness(struct task_struct *p, struct mem_cgroup *mem,
- const nodemask_t *nodemask, unsigned long uptime);
-
extern struct task_struct *find_lock_task_mm(struct task_struct *p);
/* sysctls */
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static int oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
/*
* If any of p's children has a different mm and is eligible for kill,
- * the one with the highest badness() score is sacrificed for its
+ * the one with the highest oom_badness() score is sacrificed for its
* parent. This attempts to lose the minimal amount of work done while
* still freeing memory.
*/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2011-06-22 0:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-22 0:57 David Rientjes [this message]
2011-06-22 1:45 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1106211756580.4454@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
--to=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox