From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail138.messagelabs.com (mail138.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5EC006B0012 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 12:27:10 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 11:27:04 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: slub: Default slub_max_order to 0 In-Reply-To: <1305216023.2575.54.camel@mulgrave.site> Message-ID: References: <1305127773-10570-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <1305127773-10570-4-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <1305213359.2575.46.camel@mulgrave.site> <1305214993.2575.50.camel@mulgrave.site> <20110512154649.GB4559@redhat.com> <1305216023.2575.54.camel@mulgrave.site> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: James Bottomley Cc: Dave Jones , Mel Gorman , Andrew Morton , Colin King , Raghavendra D Prabhu , Jan Kara , Chris Mason , Pekka Enberg , Rik van Riel , Johannes Weiner , linux-fsdevel , linux-mm , linux-kernel , linux-ext4 On Thu, 12 May 2011, James Bottomley wrote: > However, the fact remains that this seems to be a slub problem and it > needs fixing. Why are you so fixed on slub in these matters? Its an key component but there is a high interaction with other subsystems. There was no recent change in slub that changed the order of allocations. There were changes affecting the reclaim logic. Slub has been working just fine with the existing allocation schemes for a long time. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org