From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail203.messagelabs.com (mail203.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.243]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C667B900086 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:03:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from kpbe19.cbf.corp.google.com (kpbe19.cbf.corp.google.com [172.25.105.83]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p3FN3EU3001087 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:03:14 -0700 Received: from pwj3 (pwj3.prod.google.com [10.241.219.67]) by kpbe19.cbf.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p3FN3CXS025340 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:03:12 -0700 Received: by pwj3 with SMTP id 3so1489507pwj.29 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:03:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:03:10 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes Subject: Re: [patch v3] oom: replace PF_OOM_ORIGIN with toggling oom_score_adj In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20110414090310.07FF.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Hugh Dickins Cc: Andrew Morton , KOSAKI Motohiro , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Matt Fleming , linux-mm@kvack.org On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Hugh Dickins wrote: > This makes good sense (now you're using MAX instead of MIN!), > but may I helatedly ask you to change the name test_set_oom_score_adj() > to replace_oom_score_adj()? test_set means a bitflag operation to me. > Does replace_oom_score_adj() imply that it will be returning the old value of oom_score_adj like test_set_oom_score_adj() does? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org