From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Michael J Wolf <mjwolf@us.ibm.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/6] pagewalk: only split huge pages when necessary
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 13:22:21 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1102031257490.948@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110201003359.8DDFF665@kernel>
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Dave Hansen wrote:
>
> Right now, if a mm_walk has either ->pte_entry or ->pmd_entry
> set, it will unconditionally split and transparent huge pages
> it runs in to. In practice, that means that anyone doing a
>
> cat /proc/$pid/smaps
>
> will unconditionally break down every huge page in the process
> and depend on khugepaged to re-collapse it later. This is
> fairly suboptimal.
>
> This patch changes that behavior. It teaches each ->pmd_entry
> handler (there are three) that they must break down the THPs
> themselves. Also, the _generic_ code will never break down
> a THP unless a ->pte_entry handler is actually set.
>
> This means that the ->pmd_entry handlers can now choose to
> deal with THPs without breaking them down.
>
>
No sign-off (goes for patches 3 and 4, as well)?
> ---
>
> linux-2.6.git-dave/fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 6 ++++++
> linux-2.6.git-dave/mm/pagewalk.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff -puN mm/pagewalk.c~pagewalk-dont-always-split-thp mm/pagewalk.c
> --- linux-2.6.git/mm/pagewalk.c~pagewalk-dont-always-split-thp 2011-01-27 10:57:02.309914973 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.git-dave/mm/pagewalk.c 2011-01-27 10:57:02.317914965 -0800
> @@ -33,19 +33,35 @@ static int walk_pmd_range(pud_t *pud, un
>
> pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
> do {
> + again:
checkpatch will warn about the indent.
> next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
> - split_huge_page_pmd(walk->mm, pmd);
> - if (pmd_none_or_clear_bad(pmd)) {
> + if (pmd_none(*pmd)) {
Not sure why this has been changed from pmd_none_or_clear_bad(), that's
been done even prior to THP.
> if (walk->pte_hole)
> err = walk->pte_hole(addr, next, walk);
> if (err)
> break;
> continue;
> }
> + /*
> + * This implies that each ->pmd_entry() handler
> + * needs to know about pmd_trans_huge() pmds
> + */
Probably needs to be documented somewhere for users of pagewalk?
> if (walk->pmd_entry)
> err = walk->pmd_entry(pmd, addr, next, walk);
> - if (!err && walk->pte_entry)
> - err = walk_pte_range(pmd, addr, next, walk);
> + if (err)
> + break;
> +
> + /*
> + * Check this here so we only break down trans_huge
> + * pages when we _need_ to
> + */
> + if (!walk->pte_entry)
> + continue;
> +
> + split_huge_page_pmd(walk->mm, pmd);
> + if (pmd_none_or_clear_bad(pmd))
> + goto again;
> + err = walk_pte_range(pmd, addr, next, walk);
> if (err)
> break;
> } while (pmd++, addr = next, addr != end);
> diff -puN fs/proc/task_mmu.c~pagewalk-dont-always-split-thp fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> --- linux-2.6.git/fs/proc/task_mmu.c~pagewalk-dont-always-split-thp 2011-01-27 10:57:02.313914969 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.git-dave/fs/proc/task_mmu.c 2011-01-27 10:57:02.321914961 -0800
> @@ -343,6 +343,8 @@ static int smaps_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, u
> struct page *page;
> int mapcount;
>
> + split_huge_page_pmd(walk->mm, pmd);
> +
> pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
> for (; addr != end; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
> ptent = *pte;
> @@ -467,6 +469,8 @@ static int clear_refs_pte_range(pmd_t *p
> spinlock_t *ptl;
> struct page *page;
>
> + split_huge_page_pmd(walk->mm, pmd);
> +
> pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
> for (; addr != end; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
> ptent = *pte;
> @@ -623,6 +627,8 @@ static int pagemap_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd,
> pte_t *pte;
> int err = 0;
>
> + split_huge_page_pmd(walk->mm, pmd);
> +
> /* find the first VMA at or above 'addr' */
> vma = find_vma(walk->mm, addr);
> for (; addr != end; addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-03 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-01 0:33 [RFC][PATCH 0/6] more detailed per-process transparent hugepage statistics Dave Hansen
2011-02-01 0:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/6] count transparent hugepage splits Dave Hansen
2011-02-01 9:58 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-02-03 21:22 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-04 21:18 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-04 21:28 ` Dave Hansen
2011-02-01 0:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/6] pagewalk: only split huge pages when necessary Dave Hansen
2011-02-01 10:04 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-02-01 15:03 ` Dave Hansen
2011-02-03 21:22 ` David Rientjes [this message]
2011-02-03 21:33 ` Dave Hansen
2011-02-03 21:46 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-04 17:19 ` Dave Hansen
2011-02-04 21:10 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-01 0:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/6] break out smaps_pte_entry() from smaps_pte_range() Dave Hansen
2011-02-01 10:08 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-02-03 21:22 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-03 21:40 ` Dave Hansen
2011-02-01 0:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/6] pass pte size argument in to smaps_pte_entry() Dave Hansen
2011-02-01 10:09 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-02-03 21:22 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-01 0:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/6] teach smaps_pte_range() about THP pmds Dave Hansen
2011-02-01 10:11 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-02-01 15:02 ` Dave Hansen
2011-02-01 16:09 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-03 21:22 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-03 21:34 ` Dave Hansen
2011-02-01 0:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/6] have smaps show transparent huge pages Dave Hansen
2011-02-01 10:12 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-02-03 21:22 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-01 15:38 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/6] more detailed per-process transparent hugepage statistics Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-01 17:15 ` Dave Hansen
2011-02-01 20:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-01 20:56 ` Dave Hansen
2011-02-02 0:07 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-08 17:54 ` Dave Hansen
2011-02-08 18:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-03 21:54 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1102031257490.948@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
--to=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mjwolf@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox