linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
	Divyesh Shah <dpshah@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch] memcg: add oom killer delay
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 01:04:34 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012220057590.25848@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101222174829.226ef641.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:

> > > seems to be hard to use. No one can estimate "milisecond" for avoidling
> > > OOM-kill. I think this is very bad. Nack to this feature itself.
> > > 
> > 
> > There's no estimation that is really needed, we simply need to be able to 
> > stall long enough that we'll eventually kill "something" if userspace 
> > fails to act.
> > 
> 
> Why we have to think of usermode failure by mis configuration or user mode bug ?
> It's a work of Middleware in usual.
> Please make libcgroup or libvirt more useful.
> 

It's a general concern for users who wish to defer the kernel oom killer 
unless userspace chooses not to act or cannot act and the only way to do 
that without memory.oom_delay is to set all memcgs to have 
memory.oom_control of 1.  memory.oom_control of 1 is equivalent to 
OOM_DISABLE for all attached tasks and if all tasks are assigned non-root 
memcg for resource isolation (and the sum of those memcgs' limits equals 
system RAM), we always get memcg oom kills instead of system wide oom 
kills.  The difference in this case is that with the memcg oom kills, the 
kernel livelocks whereas the system wide oom kills would panic the machine 
since all eligible tasks are OOM_DISABLE, the equivalent of all memcgs 
having memory.oom_control of 1.

Since the kernel has opened this possibility up by disabling oom killing 
without giving userspace any other chance of deferring the oom killer, we 
need a way to preserve the machine by having a fallback plan if userspace 
cannot act.  The other possibility would be to panic if all memcgs have 
memory.oom_control of 1 and the sum of their limits equals the machine's 
memory capacity.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-12-22  9:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-22  7:27 David Rientjes
2010-12-22  7:59 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-22  8:17   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-12-22  8:31     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-12-22  8:48     ` David Rientjes
2010-12-22  8:48       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-12-22  8:55         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-12-22  9:21           ` David Rientjes
2010-12-27  1:47             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-12-22  9:04         ` David Rientjes [this message]
2010-12-22  8:42   ` David Rientjes
2010-12-22 22:45     ` [patch v2] " David Rientjes
2010-12-27  0:52       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-12-28  5:22         ` David Rientjes
2010-12-28  6:29           ` [patch v3] " David Rientjes
2011-01-04  1:41             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-01-04  3:59               ` Balbir Singh
2011-01-06  1:53                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-01-06  5:46                   ` Balbir Singh
2011-01-06  5:52                     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-12-25 10:47 ` [patch] " Balbir Singh
2010-12-26 20:35   ` David Rientjes
2011-02-08  0:24 David Rientjes
2011-02-08  1:55 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-02-08  2:13   ` David Rientjes
2011-02-08  2:13     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-02-08  2:20       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-02-08  2:37         ` David Rientjes
2011-02-08 10:25           ` Balbir Singh
2011-02-09 22:19 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-10  0:04   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-02-16  3:15     ` David Rientjes
2011-02-20 22:19       ` David Rientjes
2011-02-23 23:08   ` Andrew Morton
2011-02-24  0:13     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-02-24  0:51     ` David Rientjes
2011-03-03 20:11       ` David Rientjes
2011-03-03 21:52       ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-08  0:12         ` David Rientjes
2011-03-08  0:29           ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-08  0:36             ` David Rientjes
2011-03-08  0:51               ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-08  1:02                 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-08  1:18                   ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-08  1:33                     ` David Rientjes
2011-03-08  2:51                       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-08  3:07                         ` David Rientjes
2011-03-08  3:13                           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-08  3:56                             ` David Rientjes
2011-03-08  4:17                               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-08  5:30                                 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-08  5:49                                   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-08 23:49                                     ` David Rientjes
2011-03-09  6:04                                       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-09  6:44                                         ` David Rientjes
2011-03-09  7:16                                           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-09 21:12                                             ` David Rientjes
2011-03-08  3:06                     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1012220057590.25848@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
    --to=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dpshah@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox