From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail190.messagelabs.com (mail190.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED1AA8D0017 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 09:04:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 08:04:23 -0600 (CST) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH] set_pgdat_percpu_threshold() don't use for_each_online_cpu In-Reply-To: <20101115102617.GK27362@csn.ul.ie> Message-ID: References: <1288169256-7174-2-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> <20101028100920.5d4ce413.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20101114163727.BEE0.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20101115102617.GK27362@csn.ul.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Mel Gorman Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Andrew Morton , Shaohua Li , David Rientjes , LKML , Linux-MM , Tejun Heo List-ID: On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, Mel Gorman wrote: > With recent per-cpu allocator changes, are we guaranteed that the per-cpu > structures exist and are valid? We always guarantee that all per cpu areas for all possible cpus exist. That has always been the case. There was a discussion about changing that though. Could be difficult given the need for additional locking. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org